expo/expoweb
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://expo.survex.com/repositories/expoweb/.git/ synced 2025-12-08 14:54:28 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Online edit of cave 1623-156

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Philip Sargent
2025-03-01 10:36:23 +00:00
committed by Expo on server
parent 1f66bdfb96
commit 59eb872e29
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
cave_data/1623-156.html
View File

@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ the form documented at
<equipment></equipment>
<references></references>
<survey></p><div class="centre"><img alt="Map+survey" width="620" height="336" src="/1623/156/156.png" /></div><p>Grade 1 plan/elev of 156 and T.B.H. from <a href="/years/1987/logbook.html">1987 Log Book</a></survey>
<notes>The <a href="/years/1987/logbook.html">log book</a> (30th Aug.) refers to exploration in the vicinity of 0/1 including 156 and a nearby cave (unnumbered in 1987) <a href="/1623/199/199.html">Tumbling Boulder Hole</a>. There is, however, another piece of paper which says it is very near (and NE of) point 0/2. This appears to arise from the diagram which accompanies the log book entry, which shows 0/2 with no north arrow, and uphill up the page. If the point was really 0/1 on this diagram, then the descriptions would match, with north at 7 O'Clock on the diagram. The logbook suggests that the discoverers had visited 0/2 (and found very little nearby) and then 0/1 later, finding 156. GPS location and later a surface survey (1998) confirms that 0/1 is the correct laser point.</notes>
<notes>The <a href="/years/1987/logbook.html">log book</a> (<a href="/logbookentry/1987-08-30/1987-08-30a">30th Aug.</a>) refers to exploration in the vicinity of 0/1 including 156 and a nearby cave (unnumbered in 1987) <a href="/1623/199/199.html">Tumbling Boulder Hole</a>. There is, however, another piece of paper which says it is very near (and NE of) point 0/2. This appears to arise from the diagram which accompanies the log book entry, which shows 0/2 with no north arrow, and uphill up the page. If the point was really 0/1 on this diagram, then the descriptions would match, with north at 7 O'Clock on the diagram. The logbook suggests that the discoverers had visited 0/2 (and found very little nearby) and then 0/1 later, finding 156. GPS location and later a surface survey (1998) confirms that 0/1 is the correct laser point.</notes>
<length></length>
<depth></depth>
<extent></extent>