From 59eb872e2969ebc154e2c15672e8e2f8677b5012 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Philip Sargent Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2025 10:36:23 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Online edit of cave 1623-156 --- cave_data/1623-156.html | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/cave_data/1623-156.html b/cave_data/1623-156.html index 3c3bc287d..6423b2052 100644 --- a/cave_data/1623-156.html +++ b/cave_data/1623-156.html @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ the form documented at

Map+survey

Grade 1 plan/elev of 156 and T.B.H. from 1987 Log Book -The log book (30th Aug.) refers to exploration in the vicinity of 0/1 including 156 and a nearby cave (unnumbered in 1987) Tumbling Boulder Hole. There is, however, another piece of paper which says it is very near (and NE of) point 0/2. This appears to arise from the diagram which accompanies the log book entry, which shows 0/2 with no north arrow, and uphill up the page. If the point was really 0/1 on this diagram, then the descriptions would match, with north at 7 O'Clock on the diagram. The logbook suggests that the discoverers had visited 0/2 (and found very little nearby) and then 0/1 later, finding 156. GPS location and later a surface survey (1998) confirms that 0/1 is the correct laser point. +The log book (30th Aug.) refers to exploration in the vicinity of 0/1 including 156 and a nearby cave (unnumbered in 1987) Tumbling Boulder Hole. There is, however, another piece of paper which says it is very near (and NE of) point 0/2. This appears to arise from the diagram which accompanies the log book entry, which shows 0/2 with no north arrow, and uphill up the page. If the point was really 0/1 on this diagram, then the descriptions would match, with north at 7 O'Clock on the diagram. The logbook suggests that the discoverers had visited 0/2 (and found very little nearby) and then 0/1 later, finding 156. GPS location and later a surface survey (1998) confirms that 0/1 is the correct laser point.