expo/expoweb
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://expo.survex.com/repositories/expoweb/.git/ synced 2025-12-08 14:54:28 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[svn r6514] Mainly link fettling; also added Makefile into CVS, and put in survey data stuff

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
dave
2004-09-20 00:22:14 +02:00
parent 1faaeeeff3
commit c2a2024f5c
19 changed files with 379 additions and 175 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
handbook/cockup.htm
View File

@@ -63,11 +63,9 @@ correctly numbered 185, there were <b>two</b> other caves erroneously
numbered "185", one of which is undocumented 90/15, which needs surveying and
a real number. The other is really 186, whose marking was later
fixed.</td></tr>
<tr><td>234, 235</td><td><p>After the switch over to the new system whereby caves are given official numbers only on receipt of a form and survey, these numbers were used without permission for two caves in the vicinity of Eish&ouml;hle, on the grounds that it was highly unlikely that the numbers would be used by anyone else before the forms got sent in; the caves were thus tagged as such. However, the forms disappeared into the ether after being mistakenly posted to AERW instead of the Austrians.</p>
<tr><td>232 - 238</td><td><p>After the switch over to the new system whereby caves are given official numbers only on receipt of a form and survey, the numbers 232-5 were used for caves in the vicinity of Eish&ouml;hle, on the grounds that it was highly unlikely that the numbers would be used by anyone else before the forms got sent in; the caves were thus tagged as such. However, the forms disappeared into the ether after being mistakenly posted to AERW instead of the Austrians.</p>
<p>Later, when the next batch of caves were submitted to the Austrians for numbering, 235 was allocated to <a href="../smkridge/2000-09/2000-09.htm">Hauchh&ouml;hle</a> (2000-09). It is not known to what cave number 234 was actually allocated.</p>
<p>It is intended that new kataster numbers be applied for for the caves currently tagged 234 and 235, and the tag 235 applied to Hauchh&ouml;hle, by the end of Expo 2004.</p>
<p>This led to some discrepancies between the Austrian's numbering and ours; these were resolved by an allocation of new numbers in 2004, detailed <a href="../years/2004/kataster2004.html">here</a>. Some old documents and survey notes may be rather confusing on this point!</p>
</td></tr>
</table>