expo/expoweb
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://expo.survex.com/repositories/expoweb/.git/ synced 2025-03-20 01:01:53 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

more bloody logbook

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Philip Sargent 2019-07-20 14:28:15 +02:00
parent fa22ae21a7
commit a018d3f044
1 changed files with 32 additions and 3 deletions

35
years/2018/logbook.html

@ -1382,7 +1382,7 @@ Cycled to N.end of Altaussee lake (S.route). This took 1 hour from base camp.
<p>
Saw entrance in hillside 30m higher and about 1km on Loser side which might be a wet-weather resurgence.
<p>
Track up is very cyclable to a (locked)hut [Stumern Alm, 813m] where it stops & there is a steeply ascending
Track up is very cyclable to a (locked) hut [Stumern Alm, 813m] where it stops & there is a steeply ascending
rough path (signposted to Appelhaus) up the Trisselwand side of the valley. I parked bike.
<p>
I decided to go directly up the Loser side: "Oh Yes", I thought, "10-15 minutes
@ -1414,7 +1414,20 @@ Departed base camp 06:35, returned 13:05
<div class="tripdate" id="t2018-08-02w">2018-08-02</div>
<div class="trippeople"><u>Wookey</u>, Alex, Ryan, Manfred</div>
<div class="triptitle">Testing Tunnocks to Balkonh&ouml;hle Connection - Part One</div>
<p><h2>**** MORE TO TYPE IN HERE ****</h2>
The initial stage of the trip was navigated quickly and easily by Wookey
- having previously surveyed up to starfish junction and being well-acquainted with the system.
Beyond the junction we relied on a pixelated survey, some detailed notes, and
hand-drawn survey, all of which Wookey had nerded at base camp.
<p>Our journey to March of the Penguins was somewhat "exploratory" as weattempted
tofind the correct passage forward. The trip was halted at an unnamed pitch.
<p>
Unknown to us at the time the journey across the pitch required a traverse. We had mistakenly
rigged the pitch for a descent. Having run out of time we started our return journey with
the hope of returning.
<p>Additionally the trip allowed the team to resurvey 6 legs which may have been
contributing to the survey error in that branch(?).
<div class="timeug">T/U: 10 hours</div>
@ -1423,9 +1436,25 @@ Departed base camp 06:35, returned 13:05
<div class="tripdate" id="t2018-08-03w">2018-08-03</div>
<div class="trippeople"><u>Wookey</u>, Rory, Ryan</div>
<div class="triptitle">Testing Tunnocks to Balkonh&ouml;hle Connection - Part Two</div>
<p>
Having been confused by the pitch that required to be raversed rather than descended,
another (?) consulting other cavers, we returned the next day. The journey into the system was
quickeras the route had now been rehearsed by the group. As the traverse was being re-rigged additional re-surveying was completed.
<p>
After pushing forward it was found that we did not have enough rope to to complete the
pitch down into Icecock (even after de-rigging the traverse line).Unfortunately no cave description
for this route existed, as such, the amount of rope required was unknown.
Future trips should attempt to generate such notes for the interest of future trips.
<p>
Once again wew ran out of time, and this timerope. However the trip still provided
additional survey results with accompanying elevations (sections).
<p>
On the return journey Rory rigged the traverse line with 5 slings hooked one to another
(in the interest of speed), however it was debated if this was in fact quicker.
<p>A future trip would require more rope (greater than a 13m and 22m).
<p><h2>**** MORE TO TYPE IN HERE ****</h2>
<div class="timeug">T/U: ? hours</div>
<div class="timeug">T/U: 10 hours</div>