Add writeup of not-finding-wk4 trip.

pending/2015/Katasterable

@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
 OK, executive summary is that theshortlist of things that we ought to be able
 to feed to Robert is:
 
+B4         Has tag, survey (ol) and photo (crofton)
+1996-WK-11 explored, surveyd, tagged, photoed 
 2002-AD-03 BergKäseHöhle. Descended and surveyed 2015. wallet 2015#55 Tagged
 2002-AD-04 PG: needs survey. Seem to have 2012 survey data
 2004-01    76 bivi cave - PG: lived in but no survey !! Seem to have svx refer wallet 2006#6 which has a passable plan and elev
@@ -46,7 +48,6 @@ LA40       missing, unsurveyed, untagged, but given a lat/long probably from the
 1992-X-01  allegedly refindable, but unmarked and undescended
 1996-01    needs survey - coords are pre-SA and believed hopelessly wrong
 1996-WK-4  unexplored but coords
-1996-WK-11 exploration incomplete (probably chokes), needs survey
 1996-WK-12 needs survey, needs retag (2005-89 as no letters in tag kit)
 1996-X-01  documented as under 3m long - so should not need an Austrian number
 1996-05    apparently a non-CUCC discovery but no evidence of exploration - should be done !
@@ -78,7 +79,7 @@ LA40       missing, unsurveyed, untagged, but given a lat/long probably from the
 2002-AD-04 PG: needs survey. Seem to have 2012 survey data
 2002-OB-01 needs survey, tag and more push
 2002-W-01  PG says needs survey, but location says "see sketch in survey notes"
-2002-W-02  PG: needs survey and tag. Seem to have 2002 svx data
+2002-W-02  PG: needs survey and tag. Has 2002 svx data and tag
 2002-X-09  unmarked and undescended
 2002-X-09b unmarked - just a rock shelter, cannot need a kataster number
 2002-X-15  unmarked, needs survey and better description if over 10m

years/2015/logbook.html

@@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ immediately before Pushing The Envelope squeeze.</p>
 <hr>
 
 <div class="tripdate" id="t2015-08-09a">2015-08-09</div>
-<div class="trippeople"><u>Wookey</u>, Philip Balister, Sandy</div>
+<div class="trippeople"><u>Wookey</u>, Philip Balister, Sandy Knapp</div>
 <div class="triptitle">Document remaining wook-caves (wk12, wk11)</div>
 
 <p>Wook foolishly recorded some entrances whilst wandering in the 1990s, before realising that it's
@@ -704,6 +704,54 @@ way on is slightly too small for a person, certainly one in shorts+t-shirt, but
 <p>Still, objective of making wk11 katasterable achieved, and thinks muchly to Phil for helping carry the crap.</p>
 
 <div class="timeug">T/U: Wook:  30mins</div>
+<hr>
+
+<div class="tripdate" id="t2015-08-11a">2015-08-11</div>
+<div class="trippeople"><u>Wookey</u>, Sam Wenham</div>
+<div class="triptitle">Search for remaining wook-cave (wk4)</div>
+
+<p>Only one cave from the 1995/6 wanderings left:wk4, found when attempting to walk down from 161d to
+the Stogerweg in 1995 to see if it was a better route than back over the col (it wasn't).</p>
+
+<p>Wook and Sam set off at an unheard-of early 7am partly to get Luke up the hill in time to do
+something before derigging, and to avoid the worst of the heat of the day, at least to start
+with. As we walked past the Bla-Alm turnoff we were ahiled from up the hill, by ChrisD, Anthony,
+Elliot and Michael who wanted to leave rope in our car. Key arrangments were made, updates given and
+we carried on our way.</p>
+
+<p>Not hard to follow the Eishöhle path, passing numerous caches of ARGE gear along the way (142,
+the nipple, Eishöhle 40a). 216 has more cold air than I remember and 40h is transformed. The crawl
+is now a 4-5m-high passage with the old bolts stranded in the ceiling - soon you won't need any ice
+gear at all to get in. It was very nice to sit in the fridge as huge amounts of cold air spilled out
+of the entrance, but soon enough we had to get on with the task at hand.</p>
+
+<p>Found it remarkably easy to get down the hill about 100m back from 216, where there is a path
+down past 40d. The tag on this entrance is a rather long way from the cave now, presumably due to
+shrinking snowfield at the entrance. Carrying on down here got us to a nice traverse level below the
+main cliff here, into a large grassy amphitheatre - very nice spot. This was only 50m from pwk4, but
+this GPS point was before Selective Availabilty was turned off, so somewhat unreliable, potentially
+compounded by the steep hilside. The actual point was at the edge of the grassy area, which wasn't
+right, as it was on a shelf, with bunde either side, and a notable rectangular hole, hard to
+  traverse past, and directly above the hochlapf sattel.</p>
+
+<p>The terrain South of the grassy amphitheatre seemed about right, but it's quite heavily
+bunded. The cave should be on a nice easy route, as it was found when taking the easiest route down
+the hill, but 3 hours of wandering round, bashing a lot of bunde, and trying to find every possible
+traverse level, found no sign of the bloody hole. It just made us both very hot, scratched, and
+tired. I now have a tracklog of a large number of places that this cave is not.</p>
+
+<p>Surprised to find a red-paint marked path here (which leads to the stogerweg), and an arrow on
+the stogerweg pointing to a slightly higher path in the same area. Aparently more people come this
+way than you might think (hunters?).</p>
+
+<p>Eventually we gave up, having given it our best shot, and trogged back along the stogerweg (which
+is actually very easy to get to from this area using the paths. Took best part of 2hours to walk back to the carpark. We were really quite tired.</p>
+
+<p>Reading the logbook entry for the original discovery, I wonder if it is perhaps lower down?</p>
+
+<p>So, that was a very frustrating day. We can move this cave to the 'mostly lost' pile.</p>
+
+<div class="timeug">T/U: 2 mins in 216</div>
 
 </html>
 </body>