Add writeup of not-finding-wk4 trip.

This commit is contained in:
Wookey
2015-08-12 00:07:57 +01:00
parent 02b9c29e6a
commit 8ce1d03145
2 changed files with 52 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
OK, executive summary is that theshortlist of things that we ought to be able
to feed to Robert is:
B4 Has tag, survey (ol) and photo (crofton)
1996-WK-11 explored, surveyd, tagged, photoed
2002-AD-03 BergKäseHöhle. Descended and surveyed 2015. wallet 2015#55 Tagged
2002-AD-04 PG: needs survey. Seem to have 2012 survey data
2004-01 76 bivi cave - PG: lived in but no survey !! Seem to have svx refer wallet 2006#6 which has a passable plan and elev
@@ -46,7 +48,6 @@ LA40 missing, unsurveyed, untagged, but given a lat/long probably from the
1992-X-01 allegedly refindable, but unmarked and undescended
1996-01 needs survey - coords are pre-SA and believed hopelessly wrong
1996-WK-4 unexplored but coords
1996-WK-11 exploration incomplete (probably chokes), needs survey
1996-WK-12 needs survey, needs retag (2005-89 as no letters in tag kit)
1996-X-01 documented as under 3m long - so should not need an Austrian number
1996-05 apparently a non-CUCC discovery but no evidence of exploration - should be done !
@@ -78,7 +79,7 @@ LA40 missing, unsurveyed, untagged, but given a lat/long probably from the
2002-AD-04 PG: needs survey. Seem to have 2012 survey data
2002-OB-01 needs survey, tag and more push
2002-W-01 PG says needs survey, but location says "see sketch in survey notes"
2002-W-02 PG: needs survey and tag. Seem to have 2002 svx data
2002-W-02 PG: needs survey and tag. Has 2002 svx data and tag
2002-X-09 unmarked and undescended
2002-X-09b unmarked - just a rock shelter, cannot need a kataster number
2002-X-15 unmarked, needs survey and better description if over 10m