expo/expoweb
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://expo.survex.com/repositories/expoweb/.git/ synced 2024-11-21 23:01:55 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Online edit of cave 1623-228

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Philip Sargent 2024-07-12 17:58:17 +01:00 committed by Expo on server
parent 870c4eac9b
commit 77751774e4
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
cave_data/1623-228.html
View File

@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
<!DOCTYPE html>
<!-- This file is generated by troggle on July 12, 2024, 5:57 p.m. UTC using the form documented at /handbook/survey/caveentry.html -->
<!-- This file is generated by troggle on July 12, 2024, 5:58 p.m. UTC using the form documented at /handbook/survey/caveentry.html -->
<!-- Only put one cave in this file -->
<!-- If you edit this 162x-nnn.html file by hand, and manually upload it to the server using git,
make sure you update the database by doing a full data import. If you edit it using the online form
@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ though, you do not need to do a data import as it happens automatically -->
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"/>
</head>
<body>
<b>This file is generated by troggle</b> on July 12, 2024, 5:57 p.m. UTC using the form documented at
<b>This file is generated by troggle</b> on July 12, 2024, 5:58 p.m. UTC using the form documented at
the form documented at
<a href="/handbook/survey/caveentry.html">handbook/survey/caveentry.html</a>
<br>
@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ code used in the Austrian kataster e.g '1/S +' - https://expo/.survex.com/katast
<underground_description>Is this possibly the same as 114 ?
<p>NOTE
The shape, length and orientation of the cave is very suspiciously similar to the explored but not surveyed 1623-114 which is very close (60m) to Schnellzughohle and does indeed look like a smaller version of Schnellzughohle. So is the survey location of 1623-228 in Egglgrube valley incorrect ? It uses the nils2000 fixed point *fix 1000
<p>The location of this entrance is just above the edge of the cliff, whcih is in thick impenetrable pine scrub (failed visit 11th July 2024)<figure align="center"> <a href='/1623/228/l/228-map.html'><img src='/1623/228/t/228-map.jpg' /></a><figcaption>Click for larger image</figcaption></figure></underground_description><!-- Underground description. (description of approach and entrance goes in entrance file). For a small cave this will be the entire description. For larger caves it will be the front page of the description, or a short intro, containing links to other pages with the cave description in, or even nothing but a link. -->
<p>The location of this entrance is just above the edge of the cliff, which is in thick impenetrable pine scrub (failed visit 11th July 2024), whcih is another reason to be suspicious. <figure align="center"> <a href='/1623/228/l/228-map.html'><img src='/1623/228/t/228-map.jpg' /></a><figcaption>Click for larger image</figcaption></figure></underground_description><!-- Underground description. (description of approach and entrance goes in entrance file). For a small cave this will be the entire description. For larger caves it will be the front page of the description, or a short intro, containing links to other pages with the cave description in, or even nothing but a link. -->
<equipment></equipment><!-- For a small cave, summary of gear needed to descend. For longer caves it could be blank, a table, or just refer to the description/topos. Leave blank if this info is in the description. -->
<references></references><!-- References to documentation. Could be Journal articles or Logbook entries. Can be links if the docs are online. -->
<survey></survey><!-- Drawn-up surveys. Scans of paper surveys or images/PDFs of electronic surveys. Should include HTML to display current plan and elevation, with links to larger versions (See section on URLs and files). Could list links to multiple years of survey, or even a separate survey page if it's complicated enough. -->