mirror of
https://expo.survex.com/repositories/expoweb/.git/
synced 2026-02-25 13:45:20 +00:00
Systematically clean QM grades documentation
This commit is contained in:
@@ -49,19 +49,9 @@ description to here, and a link from here to the relevant point in the
|
||||
description. If there is no link, it means that I can't yet work out where
|
||||
the QM is in the description, or the description doesn't yet exist :-).
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Discoverer identifiers<dl>
|
||||
<dt>B<dd>Groupe Spéléeo de Clerval - Baume les Dames
|
||||
<dt>C<dd>Cambridge University Caving Club
|
||||
</dl>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Quality Grades:<dl>
|
||||
<dt>A<dd>A fine QM - git down there and look.
|
||||
<dt>B<dd>Not so promising, or requiring some effort (eg. a climb)
|
||||
<dt>C<dd>Pretty cruddy, or good but very hard to get to.
|
||||
<dt>V<dd>An aven which might be climbable, but not adequately assessed
|
||||
<dt>X<dd>A high, wet or unsafe-looking aven unlikely to be climbed
|
||||
<dt>?<dd>No-one writing this list actually knows!
|
||||
</dl>
|
||||
<p>Quality Grades: see documentation at <a href="/handbook/survey/qm.html">QM conventions</a>.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Note that the quality grades are assigned by the explorers at the time,
|
||||
and that subsequent discoveries may mean that the grade is optimistic, since
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user