Systematically clean QM grades documentation

This commit is contained in:
2023-03-17 14:34:07 +00:00
committed by Wookey
parent 94fa429ad3
commit 0f0b0633a9
10 changed files with 59 additions and 64 deletions

View File

@@ -49,19 +49,9 @@ description to here, and a link from here to the relevant point in the
description. If there is no link, it means that I can't yet work out where
the QM is in the description, or the description doesn't yet exist :-).
<p>Discoverer identifiers<dl>
<dt>B<dd>Groupe Sp&eacute;l&eacute;eo de Clerval - Baume les Dames
<dt>C<dd>Cambridge University Caving Club
</dl>
<p>Quality Grades:<dl>
<dt>A<dd>A fine QM - git down there and look.
<dt>B<dd>Not so promising, or requiring some effort (eg. a climb)
<dt>C<dd>Pretty cruddy, or good but very hard to get to.
<dt>V<dd>An aven which might be climbable, but not adequately assessed
<dt>X<dd>A high, wet or unsafe-looking aven unlikely to be climbed
<dt>?<dd>No-one writing this list actually knows!
</dl>
<p>Quality Grades: see documentation at <a href="/handbook/survey/qm.html">QM conventions</a>.
<p>Note that the quality grades are assigned by the explorers at the time,
and that subsequent discoveries may mean that the grade is optimistic, since