expoweb/noinfo/cave_data/1623-154.html

45 lines
1.9 KiB
HTML

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN">
<!-- Only put one cave in this file -->
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"/>
</head>
<body>
<cave>
<non_public>False</non_public>
<caveslug>1623-154</caveslug>
<official_name>Schwa Schacht 154</official_name>
<area>1623</area>
<area>2b</area>
<kataster_code>1/S x</kataster_code>
<kataster_number>154</kataster_number>
<unofficial_number></unofficial_number>
<entrance>
<entranceslug>1623-154a</entranceslug>
<letter>a</letter>
</entrance>
<entrance>
<entranceslug>1623-154b</entranceslug>
<letter>b</letter>
</entrance>
<explorers>Discovered CUCC 1985 (on last day), explored 1987</explorers>
<underground_description>Loose pitch head gives onto 5m entrance pitch. A rift leads off but quickly chokes, while a draughting slot could be dug, but is rather loose and dangerous, so was left.</underground_description>
<equipment></equipment>
<references></references>
<survey>Grade 1 plan (no scale) from 1987 Log Book, surface survey from Bunter's Bulge.</p><div class="centre"><img alt="sketch - 3k gif" width="280" height="250" src="others/154.png" /></div><p></survey>
<kataster_status></kataster_status>
<underground_centre_line></underground_centre_line>
<notes>This doesn't sound much like the 1985 log book description, which is of a climb down in a rift below the survey mark into a chamber with daylight entering in two or three places. There is another way out, though where this is isn't mentioned, and the cave needed a rope to push further. However, the 1987 sketch does sound like this ! It is not clear whether the 1987 push addressed the way out needing a rope - perhaps another look would be a good idea, if a party is working in this area.</notes>
<length></length>
<depth></depth>
<extent></extent>
<survex_file></survex_file>
<description_file>smkridge/154.htm</description_file>
<url>smkridge/154.htm</url>
</cave>
</body>
</html>