expoweb/handbook/survey/qm.html
Philip Sargent 3cae883304 moe QM bits
2021-12-30 16:20:45 +00:00

89 lines
3.3 KiB
HTML

<!DOCTYPE html">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/css/main2.css" />
<title>CUCC Austria Expeditions: QM list conventions</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>Question Mark list conventions</h1>
<p>This page is somewhat outdated. For the current 21st century QM methods,
where we store QMs in the survex files, see
<ul>
<li><a href="qmentry.html">QM data and cave descriptions</a>
<li><a href="newsurvex.html#tickqm">Entering the QM data</a>
<li>Only if really keen: <a href="../troggle/scriptsqms.html">QMs - the fourfold path</a>
</ul>
<p>The format for question mark lists is QM identifier, Quality Grade, Area
indicator, decription of QM. The QM numbers themselves are in the format
Discoverer identifier, Year of discovery, Cave identifier, serial number.
<p>[Archaic: If
you look at the html, you will find that the nearest survey station (without
its "&lt;cavenumber&gt;." prefix) is included in an html comment for almost all
leads.]</p>
<p>In general, an unpushed QM will have a link from its QM number in the
cave description file to the HTML QM list file (generated by a perl script for caves 204, 234 and 258), and a link from the list to the relevant point in the
description. If there is no link, it means that we can't yet work out where the
QM is in the description, or the description doesn't yet exist :-).</p>
<h2>Discoverer identifiers</h2>
<dl>
<dt>A</dt>
<dd>ARGE</dd>
<dt>B</dt>
<dd>Groupe Sp&eacute;l&eacute;o de Clerval - Baume les Dames </dd>
<dt>C</dt>
<dd>Cambridge University Caving Club</dd>
</dl>
<h2>Quality grades</h2>
<dl>
<dt>A</dt>
<dd>A fine QM - git down there and look. </dd>
<dt>B</dt>
<dd>Not so promising, or requiring some effort (eg. a climb) </dd>
<dt>C</dt>
<dd>Pretty cruddy, or good but very hard to get to.</dd>
<dt>D</dt>
<dd>A dig- only possible to continue if loose rocks or soil are removed.</dd>
<dt>V</dt>
<dd>An aven which might be climbable, but not adequately assessed</dd>
<dt>X</dt>
<dd>A high, wet or unsafe-looking aven unlikely to be climbed</dd>
<dt>?</dt>
<dd>No-one writing this list actually knows!</dd>
</dl>
<p>Note that the quality grades are assigned by the explorers at the time, and
that subsequent discoveries may mean that the grade is optimistic, since the
lead may now drop into passage which wasn't then explored. Also, different
explorers have different ideas, or different waist sizes - one man's "A-lead"
may be another's "C-lead" :-(</p>
<hr />
<ul id="links">
<li>Back to <a href="https://camcaving.uk/">CUCC Home page</a></li>
<li>Back to <a href="index.htm">Expedition Intro page</a></li>
<li><b>Main Indices:</b>
<ul>
<li><a href="infodx.htm"><b>Index</b> to Expo</a> information pages</li>
<li><a href="areas.htm">Description of CUCC's area</a> and split to subareas</li>
<li>Full <a href="indxal.htm">Index to cave descriptions</a> in area 1623</li>
<li>List of (links to) <a href="pubs.htm">published reports and logbooks</a></li>
</ul></li>
<li><b>Pictures:</b>
<ul>
<li><a href="gall0.htm">Text only Index</a></li>
<li><a href="gallery/0.htm">Index pages (with thumbnails)</a></li>
</ul></li>
<li>Table of <a href="folk/index.htm"><b>members</b> of CUCC expeditions</a> 1976-present</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>