expoweb/geolog2.htm

130 lines
7.1 KiB
HTML

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf8" />
<title>CUCC Austria Expeditions: Geological Outline</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="css/main2.css" />
</head>
<body>
<h1>Outline Geology of the Loser Plateau</h1>
<h2>Latest publications</h2>
<p>In May 2023 a speleogenesis article was published about our 'next door' cave system:
<a href="https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2471&context=ijs">4D flow pattern of the longest cave in the Eastern Alps (Schönberg-Höhlensystem, Totes Gebirge)</a>:
<ul>
<li>Speleogenesis of a 156 km long and 1061 m deep Alpine cave system is studied
<li>Arrangement of passages at two slightly inclined planes is confirmed as speleogenetic phases
<li>Morphological observations reveal a reversal of flow-direction through time
<li>According to current hydrological conditions, a dual flow is proposed
<li>Unlike other karst massifs in the NCA, sediments support autogenic recharge for Totes Gebirge
</ul>
<h2>Robert Winkler and Anthony Day - 2013</h2>
<div class="centre"><img src="geology.jpg" width="100%"
alt="Geological map" /></div>
<p><i><a href="/expofiles/documents/cave_science_articles/german-stuff/winkler-day-2013-SMK-DieHoehle_064.pdf">
Winkler & Day</a>, Die Hohle/64 Jg./Heft 1-4/ (2013) pp 62-71</i></p>
<hr>
<p>Locally-hosted copies of extensive archive of geology and cave formation papers:
<ul>
<li><a href="/expofiles/documents/cave_science_articles/structural-geology/">
Structural geology</a>
<li><a href="/expofiles/documents/cave_science_articles/speleogenesis/">
Speleogenesis</a>
<li><a href="/expofiles/documents/cave_science_articles/landscape-evolution-paleoclimate/">
Paleoclimate and landscape</a>
<li><a href="/expofiles/documents/cave_science_articles/">
Other cave science articles</a>
<li><a href="/expofiles/documents/cave_science_articles/german-stuff/">
(papers in German)</a>
</ul>
<h2>Anonymous writeup - 2013</h2>
<p><em>Anon.</em> (2015)
<p>Much of the area of the Loser Augst-Eck plateau is rough limestone pavement
(<b>karren</b>), liberally covered with dense areas of dwarf pine, and
interspersed with small cliffs, open shafts and snow patches. To the new
visitor, it all looks alike, and even to the geologist, there are few marker
beds and no obvious structure. This tended to produce the attitude that "its
all limestone, with caves in", and little more effort was made.</p>
<p>Articles speculating on the geology appeared from time to time in
<b>Cambridge Underground</b>, written by people with varying degrees
of expertise, and based on either limited literature searches or some
evidence gathered "on the ground" - including a perusal of various cave
surveys. Jared West's <a href="years/1987/geolog.htm">article</a> in C.U.
1988 pretty much summarises the literature. A geologic sketch map of the area
is based on "The Geology of the Eastern Alps", by Prof. E.R.Oxburgh (The
Geologists Association, London, 1968):</p>
<div class="centre"><img src="maps/jared.png" width="1258" height="632"
alt="Geological map" /></div>
<p>From this it can be seen that our area is composed of the massively bedded
white Dachsteinkalk limestone of Triassic age. The summit of the Loser and
adjacent peaks is more recent Jurassic limestones. The oldest of these,
particularly obvious in the Br&auml;uning Wall, are quite thinly bedded Liassic
marls. All these sediments have been pushed NNE in the Totengebirgs-Decke, a
massive thrust. This is bounded to the SW, roughly along the line of the road
from Altaussee to Blaa-Alm, by a thrust plane. SW of this boundary, the surface
is entirely composed of Jurassic sediments, with little of speleological
interest. To the SE, the Loser block is bounded by a fault which runs along the
NW shore of the Altausseer See. The Trisselwand is composed of Jurassic
limestone, younger than the Liassic marls, and is also massively bedded and
seems to contain at least some cave development.</p>
<p>Less obvious is the observation that in the Rettenbachtal to the west of
Loser, Jurassic rocks are again exposed, separated from the Dachsteinkalk
outcrop by a band of Liassic marls, which also extend NE up the valley of
Gr&uuml;ne Bichl. This is apparently the trace of a second thrust plane,
(higher than the one shown on the map above) where the Dachsteinkalk has
effectively slid north lubricated by a layer of salt (which itself is most
obvious in the local Salzbergwerk - salt mines). This suggests that the
situation is rather more complex than the single thrust depicted above, but, if
true, at least eliminates the idea that the Loser plateau is a nappe, with
these lower beds inverted, and a shattered core at half the depth of the
Dachsteinkalk which would prevent exploration to great depth. This is
supported by direct exploration of the Stellerweg streamway, which has reached
roughly lake level, which is quite near the level of the main thrust plane.</p>
<p>The Dachsteinkalk all looks very similar, and much of the rock underground
is concealed by mud or breakdown, so it has proved very difficult to make any
meaningful observations. It has become clear, however, that all or most of the
vertical development in the caves is fault- or joint-guided, on two roughly
perpendicular sub-vertical sets of faults/joints. That some of these are indeed
faults is shown by clear offset of beds in a few places where prominent shelly
beds act as markers. Some faults are also apparent running for significant
distances on the surface, sub-parallel with the massive fault bounding the
Loser block to the SE.</p>
<p>The fossil phreatic passages seem to be much less dependent on joint
direction, and appear to follow certain beds of the Dachsteinkalk. The clearest
example is Yapate Inlet and Chicken Flied Nice, near Burble crawl in <a
href="/1623/161/161.html">Kaninchenh&ouml;hle</a>.</p>
<div class="centre"><img src="1623/161/fullsize/cfngeo.png" width="600"
height="530" alt="Cross-section sketch of Yapate and Burble Crawl" /></div>
<p>Here, the small inlet tube of Burble Crawl, and the original main trunk tube
of CFN are both formed in a massive creamy white bed of limestone just above a
0.8m thick zone of thinly bedded limestone. At Staircase 36, the beds can be
seen to be offset at a fault running roughly at right angles to the main
passage, and Yapate Inlet, south of the fault, is formed in exactly the same
bed, but a few metres lower in altitude. The much later vadose downcutting has
revealed the lower beds including the two shelly beds containing many fossil
bivalves. These fossils stand out particularly well on the wall of Staircase 36
itself, where they provided much-needed holds for the climb.</p>
<p><i>to be continued...</i></p>
<hr />
Link to <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Alps">Wikipedia: Eastern Alps Geology</a>.
<br>
Link to <a href="geolog.htm">Olaf's Geological Outline (2012)</a>.
<br />
Link to <a href="years/1987/geolog.htm">Jared's Geological Guide (1988)</a>.
<br />
Link to <a href="https://onrappel.blogspot.com/2018/05/dachstein-massif-geology-intro.html">Excellent long article on Dachsteinkalk</a>
<hr /></body>
</html>