mirror of
https://expo.survex.com/repositories/expoweb/.git/
synced 2024-11-22 15:21:55 +00:00
76 lines
3.6 KiB
HTML
76 lines
3.6 KiB
HTML
<!DOCTYPE html>
|
|
<!-- Only put one entrance in this file -->
|
|
<!-- This file is generated by troggle on Oct. 20, 2023, 3:34 p.m. UTC using the form documented at handbook/survey/ententry.html -->
|
|
<!-- If you edit this file by hand, and manually upload it to the server using git,
|
|
make sure you update the database by doing a full data import. If you edit it using the online form
|
|
though, you do not need to do a data import as it happens automatically -->
|
|
|
|
<!-- See http://expo.survex.com/handbook/survey/caveentryfields.html for current details on filling in this form -->
|
|
<!-- there is 1 required field: slug. The entrance will not appear without that. -->
|
|
<!-- ALWAYS use ü for u+Umlaut and ö for o+umlaut eg Höhle for Hohle and Glück for Gluck-->
|
|
|
|
<html lang="en">
|
|
<head>
|
|
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"/>
|
|
</head>
|
|
<body>
|
|
<b>This file is generated by troggle</b> on Oct. 20, 2023, 3:34 p.m. UTC using the form documented at
|
|
<a href="/handbook/survey/ententry.html">handbook/survey/ententry.html</a>
|
|
<br>
|
|
<entrance>
|
|
<non_public>False</non_public>
|
|
<!-- <slug> ignored, not needed. Now using filename -->
|
|
<!-- <slug> ignored, not needed. Now using filename -->
|
|
<name></name>
|
|
<entrance_description>Daniel Ginger Heins:
|
|
<pre>[pit] should be >10' if I recall right, so I would've thought that would've been well identifiable but point taken that in practice it doesn't seem to be as clear as I was thinking it'd be (assuming the "west of homecoming" is accurate)
|
|
|
|
47.696565, 13.803737
|
|
https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=1f7cf2d0-63be-488c-bed6-7f521a459f8f&cp=47.69654%7E13.803728&lvl=20.4&style=h&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027
|
|
|
|
That might be it but I can't say for sure if that's actually a hole or just a cliff shadow. But nonetheless, it'd be that sort of feature - a shadow of a hole on a decent size slab of pavement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I do think I remember clambering up the boulder on the north end of that slab, which is a decently positive sign but can't 100% say that those were the same slabs
|
|
|
|
if I had to guess this might be the other complex [Boop-da-etc] , it matches my rough recollections and notes but obviously isn't as distinct as the other
|
|
https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=6c43eb16-8ec7-46a4-9557-083976268780&cp=47.697241~13.801916&lvl=19.845789&style=h&pi=0&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027
|
|
|
|
(that's low confidence, but it at least is a near-ish patch of exposed limestone with a cliff around half of it. the entrances wold not be as clear since they'd be obscured by cliff shadows)
|
|
</pre></entrance_description>
|
|
<explorers></explorers>
|
|
<map_description></map_description>
|
|
<location_description></location_description>
|
|
<lastvisit></lastvisit>
|
|
<approach></approach>
|
|
<underground_description></underground_description>
|
|
<photo></photo>
|
|
<!-- marking options: P = Paint,
|
|
P? = Paint (?),
|
|
T = Tag,
|
|
T? = Tag (?),
|
|
R = Retagged,
|
|
S = Spit,
|
|
S? = Spit (?),
|
|
U = Unmarked,
|
|
? = Unknown" -->
|
|
<marking>U</marking>
|
|
<marking_comment></marking_comment>
|
|
<!-- findability options: ? = To be confirmed ...,
|
|
S = Surveyed,
|
|
L = Lost,
|
|
R = Refindable" -->
|
|
<findability>L</findability>
|
|
<findability_description>On JOn's GPS 2019 tracklog, which we don't have</findability_description>
|
|
<alt></alt>
|
|
<lat_wgs84>47.697241</lat_wgs84>
|
|
<long_wgs84>13.801916</long_wgs84>
|
|
<tag_station></tag_station>
|
|
<other_station></other_station>
|
|
<other_description></other_description>
|
|
<bearings></bearings>
|
|
<url></url>
|
|
</entrance>
|
|
</body>
|
|
</html>
|