Fixup large collection of mixed-linefeed files in cave_data

This commit is contained in:
Wookey
2023-04-27 14:49:58 +01:00
parent af7cd5e477
commit faa5af7c3e
36 changed files with 988 additions and 988 deletions

View File

@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ code used in the Austrian kataster e.g '1/S +' - https://expo/.survex.com/katast
<letter>a</letter><!--Leave blank for single-entrance cave. If there is more than one entrace then the letter needs to be given. Generally matches the entranceslug ID. -->
</entrance>
<explorers>Dan Lenartowicz
<explorers>Dan Lenartowicz
Matt Watson</explorers><!-- 'CUCC Expo' and year(s) of exploration. To distinguish from caves explored by foreign groups. Individual names can be given too if it was a small cave. -->
<underground_description>p7 leads into chossy rift, small crawl that would need digging. No other ways on.</underground_description><!-- Underground description. (description of approach and entrance goes in entrance file). For a small cave this will be the entire description. For larger caves it will be the front page of the description, or a short intro, containing links to other pages with the cave description in, or even nothing but a link. -->
<equipment>2 Hangers, 2 slings, 20m Rope</equipment><!-- For a small cave, summary of gear needed to descend. For longer caves it could be blank, a table, or just refer to the description/topos. Leave blank if this info is in the description. -->
@@ -44,10 +44,10 @@ Matt Watson</explorers><!-- 'CUCC Expo' and year(s) of exploration. To distingui
<survey></survey><!-- Drawn-up surveys. Scans of paper surveys or images/PDFs of electronic surveys. Should include HTML to display current plan and elevation, with links to larger versions (See section on URLs and files). Could list links to multiple years of survey, or even a separate survey page if it's complicated enough. -->
<kataster_status></kataster_status>
<underground_centre_line></underground_centre_line><!-- 'In dataset' if it is in the survex dataset. Blank if not, or notes about status such as 'surveyed, but no entrance fix so not yet in dataset'. -->
<notes>On 2018-06-06 04:24 +0100, Wookey wrote:
Last week the GMH centreline work was completed and checked in, and the therionising progressed a bit and we eventually (with a lot of
email) got to the bottom of the 'is Shagged Spit/GutenMorgenHoehle the same cave' mystery. Thanks to all who contributed - it was hard work, but we got there.
<notes>On 2018-06-06 04:24 +0100, Wookey wrote:
Last week the GMH centreline work was completed and checked in, and the therionising progressed a bit and we eventually (with a lot of
email) got to the bottom of the 'is Shagged Spit/GutenMorgenHoehle the same cave' mystery. Thanks to all who contributed - it was hard work, but we got there.
(The answer is no, there are two entrances, originally believed to be the same cave, the upper (tagged, explored, described, unsurveyed, unlocated, unphotoed) one is SS and the lower (explored, surveyed, photoed, undescribed, located) one is GMH).</notes><!-- Normally empty, but place for anything else that should be noted, such as info on cave maybe being a duplicate, or lost -->
<length>10m</length><!-- Cave length. Can be left blank and system should fill it in automatically from survey data (it doesn't yet) -->
<depth>7m</depth><!--Cave depth. Can be left blank and system should fill it in automatically from survey data (it doesn't yet) -->