expo/expoweb
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://expo.survex.com/repositories/expoweb/.git/ synced 2025-12-09 07:14:36 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

make /1623 absolute not relative - on the way to fixing cave URLs

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Philip Sargent
2024-12-16 22:24:53 +00:00
parent 38926af89a
commit f020d3a51a
57 changed files with 336 additions and 336 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
handbook/cockup.htm
View File

@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ Allegedly this number was changed to 87A or 87B, but in fact this is not the
case and this number needs to be removed. [In 2018 the number has faded so badly that you can only just see that it once said "88".]</td></tr>
<tr><td>106</td><td>This was a number which we were entitled to use, and
which we applied to <a href="../1623/76/76.htm">Eislufth&ouml;hle</a>,
which we applied to <a href="/1623/76/76.htm">Eislufth&ouml;hle</a>,
an early significant find. However, the cave was written up in a
non-CUCC publication which went to the Austrians, who allocated this cave
their own number (76) since our number wasn't mentioned. This makes a lot of
@@ -55,14 +55,14 @@ confusing, but the net result is that 106 is probably not our number anymore. We
believe that the Austrians have not reused it, and in fact it appears they
still refer to Eislufth&ouml;hle as 106 in places.</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="../1623/141.htm">141</a>,<a href="../1623/142.htm">142</a></td>
<tr><td><a href="/1623/141.htm">141</a>,<a href="/1623/142.htm">142</a></td>
<td>These were incorrectly labelled 131 and 132 (respectively) in paint. 142 has since been corrected, but it seems 141 may still be marked 131.</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="/cave/1623-114">114</a>
</td><td>This cave was completely missing! (found in 1980, but no
record was published - the logbook is missing). Identified as being same as cave found in 2018 and explored to 20m conclusion in 2019.</td></tr>
<tr><td>185</td><td>Apart from <a name="x185" href="../1623/185/185.html">2
<tr><td>185</td><td>Apart from <a name="x185" href="/1623/185/185.html">2
Year Gestation H&ouml;hle</a> (on the col en route to 161a) which is
correctly numbered 185, there may have been <b>two</b> other caves erroneously
numbered "185". One of these is really 186, whose marking was corrected