[svn r5845] Corrected some spelling errors

This commit is contained in:
dl267 2004-04-26 23:12:23 +02:00
parent b48d4fae09
commit de42578f1b
7 changed files with 19 additions and 19 deletions

View File

@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ example to locate a newly-discovered entrance.</p>
<table class="trad">
<tr><td>BN</td><td>Br&auml;uningnase </td></tr>
<tr><td>VSK</td><td>Vord Schwarzmooskogel (this is multisummited and not
<tr><td>VSK</td><td>Vord Schwarzmooskogel (this is multi-summited and not
terribly useful) </td></tr>
<tr><td>HSK</td><td>Hinter Schwarzmooskogel - either only one summit is
apparent, or we don't know which summit was used </td></tr>
@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ href="../piclinks/bw_pks.htm">far</a> views for clarification) </td></tr>
<tr><td>KWK</td><td>Bearings taken by Kate to the "Kleine Wehr Kogel" a hill
which is unfortunately invisible from the plateau! It turns out that this is
actually Klein Wildkogel - but transcripts of original documents will still
use this abreviation.</td></tr>
use this abbreviation.</td></tr>
</table>
<hr />

View File

@ -2,12 +2,12 @@
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
<title>CUCC Expo Prospecting Handbook: Cockups</title>
<title>CUCC Expo Prospecting Handbook: Cock-ups</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="../css/main2.css" />
</head>
<body>
<h2 id="tophead">CUCC Expo Prospecting Handbook</h2>
<h1>Non-CUCC caves, and CUCC cockups</h1>
<h1>Non-CUCC caves, and CUCC cock-ups</h1>
<p>Caves with the following numbers were not explored by CUCC,
though those we have come across and can find again are recorded in
@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ exploration by CUCC, so included as "one of ours".</td></tr>
<tr><td>166-170</td><td>not our numbers</td></tr>
<tr><td>202, 203, 206</td><td>used for Arge finds</td></tr>
<tr><td>202, 203, 206</td><td>used for ARGE finds</td></tr>
<tr><td>211-213, 221</td><td>not our numbers</td></tr>
@ -35,9 +35,9 @@ exploration by CUCC, so included as "one of ours".</td></tr>
</table>
<h3>Cockups</h3>
<h3>Cock-ups</h3>
<p>The following caves have, for one reason or another, been misnumbered by CUCC members over the years. We make no claims that these are the only cockups that may have occurred.</p>
<p>The following caves have, for one reason or another, been misnumbered by CUCC members over the years. We make no claims that these are the only cock-ups that may have occurred.</p>
<table class="trad">
<tr><td><a name="x88">88</a></td><td>Numbered in red, but didn't go. Number

View File

@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ been changed to 87A (OK) or 87B (bad) in 1987</td></tr>
</td><td>believed numbered (a 'German' cave)<br />
and on a CUCC surface survey<br />
A <a href="cockup.htm#x88">CUCC cave</a> which is marked 88 should be
denumbered.</td></tr>
de-numbered.</td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td><a href="../plateau/90.htm">90</a>
</td><td>Marked in red (1977, last seen 1998)<br />
@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ VSK 110&deg; HSK 070&deg; BS 180&deg; BZ 210&deg; 95TC 144&deg;</td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td><a href="../smkridge/185.htm">185</a>
</td><td>No. in red, surface survey. NB this is not = CUCC 1990/15<br />
There are up to 3 caves marked 185
(see <a href="cockup.htm#x185">Cockups</a>)</td></tr>
(see <a href="cockup.htm#x185">Cock-ups</a>)</td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td><a href="../kratzer/186.htm">186</a>
</td><td>was marked 185 + (now changed), metal tag "CUCC 186", 1997<br />

View File

@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ but a rather different emphasis)</li>
<ul>
<li>Get some people interested ! Don't intimidate your novices by making
them think that expo is compulsory and hard, but do hold it up as one of
the main aims of the club and well worth getting competant for. A few expo
the main aims of the club and well worth getting competent for. A few expo
pictures in any squash presentation are always worth while.</li>
<li>Start motivating your core of experienced cavers by New Year - you
will need to start assigning jobs to people by then, and an idea of the
@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ have met the old lags before expo.</li>
<p>There should be nothing left to the last minute (ho ho !).
But unless you are an amazing organiser with unbelievably cooperative
expo members of exceptional competance and self-reliance, there will be
expo members of exceptional competence and self-reliance, there will be
a panic for the last couple of weeks at least.</p>
<ul>
@ -207,11 +207,11 @@ be there next year.</p>
trip (zero if trip failed to happen).</li>
<li>Log Book - get people to write trips up as soon as possible. If passage
names are decided later, go back and write them in, as it makes the log a
lot more useable. Standards of logbook writing have been a little poor lately;
lot more usable. Standards of logbook writing have been a little poor lately;
there are certain repeat offenders who should be strongly encouraged to write
stuff in.</li>
<li>Survey calibration - make sure people do it, or at least record which
intruments they used.</li>
instruments they used.</li>
<li>Survey book - as soon as surveyors are at base camp, get this written
up - don't let anyone go home without writing up their survey!!!</li>
<li>Photos - make sure some are taken, preferably underground in new finds.

View File

@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ their system.</p>
invested effort, CUCC now applies its own unique number to each new cave,
ideally at the time of discovery, using a rock anchor and a tag which can be
replaced when an 'official' number tag is available. As of 2000, the standard
practice has been to allocate inital numbers of the form "year-nn", e.g.
practice has been to allocate initial numbers of the form "year-nn", e.g.
2003-01. This means that the cave can be identified when refound, even if
no-one who knew where it was came out in subsequent years. Clearly, a good
surface location is also pretty essential.</p>

View File

@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ tried).</p>
<p>But for an up to the minute (maybe) idea of the weather <b>right now</b>,
try the <a href="http://linux1.hs2-badaussee.asn-graz.ac.at/live1/">Loser
WebCam</a> - giving a current view of Loser from somewhere near the bottom of
the skilifts - or (slightly further away but usually better photos - caution!
the ski-lifts - or (slightly further away but usually better photos - caution!
These could induce an irresistible desire to drop everything and travel to
Austria immediately!) the <a
href="http://members.aon.at/imw/tageseng.htm">Grundlsee Photo of the

View File

@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ detail that was never really visible in slide shows.</p>
<p>Quite a bit of "notebook" photography has been done with a video camera
and digitiser card. This is a handy way of getting quick pictures of
entrances and aproach routes (and much cheaper than Photo-CD, if you have the
entrances and approach routes (and much cheaper than Photo-CD, if you have the
equipment), but the quality leaves a certain amount to be desired (it would
be improved by a slightly less cheapo video digitiser). Some pictures are
also here courtesy of video of postcard-sized prints.</p>
@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ pausing for one or two more attempts. Exit, apparently after total failure.</p>
<p>In fact, the second photographer, who hasn't had his gear out of its ammo
can since his previous expedition photographic trip three years earlier, does
turn out to have a few useable shots.</p>
turn out to have a few usable shots.</p>
<p>This is probably how <b>not</b> to do it, though it does illustrate the
problems. Can anybody write something more positive?</p>
@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ cavers whose faces appear on the photo.</li>
<li>Do use a tripod - the heavier the better for photography, but worse
for caving with. Tiny pocket tripods are great for allowing cameras
topple off boulders and into the all-prevading mud, but crap for getting
topple off boulders and into the all-pervading mud, but crap for getting
your eye anywhere near the viewfinder.</li>
<li>Do use slaves. I don't mean people who will take orders (though they
@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ moving when the flash fires, otherwise they look awkward and off-balance.</li>
<li>Photography rarely combines well with exploration - the trip just gets
slowed up too much with both bolting and photography and everyone gets cold.
However, quick snapshots at pitch heads or at the exits from crawls can
work if the photographer is fairly well practiced. Similarly, photography
work if the photographer is fairly well practised. Similarly, photography
doesn't combine well with surveying, as both activities are slow-moving and
result in lots of people generating great clouds of steam.</li>