expo/expoweb
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://expo.survex.com/repositories/expoweb/.git/ synced 2025-12-09 15:24:31 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Update cave lists with 2016 kataster numbers

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Wookey
2016-08-02 03:58:21 +01:00
parent b788192c85
commit dbb910a3f2
2 changed files with 16 additions and 16 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
pending/2015/Katasterable
View File

@@ -2,17 +2,14 @@ OK, executive summary is that theshortlist of things that we ought to be able
to feed to Robert is:
B4 Has tag, survey (ol) and photo (crofton)
1996-WK-11 explored, surveyd, tagged, photoed
2002-AD-03 BergKäseHöhle. Descended and surveyed 2015. wallet 2015#55 Tagged
2002-AD-04 PG: needs survey. Seem to have 2012 survey data
2004-01 76 bivi cave - PG: lived in but no survey !! Seem to have svx refer wallet 2006#6 which has a passable plan and elev
2004-03 PG: tagged, no survey. 6 legs of svx, refer wallet 2006#15 which contains something that could be drawn as a plan
2004-14 surveyed, but drawing lost. refer wallet 2004#41
2004-15 svx, refer wallet 2004#41
2004-19 svx refer wallet 2004#46 - looks like we could draw an adequate survey oh, => 1623/254
2004-20 svx refer wallet 2004#51 - looks like we could draw an adequate survey oh, => 1623/255
2006-73 tagged, unexplored. But seems to be a survey in 2006#31 under name Ice Curtain Cave. No description on website.
2014-SD-01 2014 SD 01 looks a convincing set of docs
2014-SD-01 Now 1623/274. needs photo
2006-71 not in PG. see wallet 2006#16
@@ -26,7 +23,6 @@ A1 missing, unsurveyed, untagged
B1 missing, unsurveyed, untagged
B2 missing, unsurveyed, untagged
B3 missing, unsurveyed, untagged - may be findable starting from B4
B4 needs survey and entrance photo
B5 missing, unsurveyed, untagged, but almost certainly identical with a kataster-numbered cave
B6 missing, probably numbered in invisible green paint. 8m blind. Too small to go in kataster.
B10 missing, occasional sightings ? probably numbered in invisible green paint
@@ -44,10 +40,9 @@ LA35 missing, unsurveyed, untagged, but given a lat/long probably from the
LA37 missing, unsurveyed, untagged, but given a lat/long probably from the map
LA38 missing, unsurveyed, untagged, but given a lat/long probably from the map
LA40 missing, unsurveyed, untagged, but given a lat/long probably from the map
1987-02 PG: needs survey, and possibly more exploration. We have 30+ legs of 2007 data
1992-X-01 allegedly refindable, but unmarked and undescended
1996-01 needs survey - coords are pre-SA and believed hopelessly wrong
1996-WK-4 unexplored but coords
1996-WK-4 unexplored but (pre-SA) coords
1996-WK-12 needs survey, needs retag (2005-89 as no letters in tag kit)
1996-X-01 documented as under 3m long - so should not need an Austrian number
1996-05 apparently a non-CUCC discovery but no evidence of exploration - should be done !
@@ -139,7 +134,6 @@ LA40 missing, unsurveyed, untagged, but given a lat/long probably from the
2006-71 not in PG. see wallet 2006#16
2006-72 surveyed, but drawing lost
2007-70 surveyed, but drawing lost
2007-71 surveyed, but drawing lost
2007-72 surveyed, but drawing lost
2011-01 needs survey, 1 QM C
2012-HW-01 needs survey or may be less than 10m and not needing kataster number