From d9370407d4869493c4a23882befb5a0951580ad7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Philip Sargent Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 19:10:17 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Example of Troggle Use --- handbook/troggle/trogusers.html | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/handbook/troggle/trogusers.html b/handbook/troggle/trogusers.html index 5e99262e6..1b8179bd8 100644 --- a/handbook/troggle/trogusers.html +++ b/handbook/troggle/trogusers.html @@ -15,14 +15,68 @@

We have several quite different sorts of cavers who interact with troggle: git logo

These are some of the "use cases" for which troggle needs to be (re)designed to cope with. +

Real example

+

In March 2023, Radost analysed a lot of cave survey and proposed that there were 3 places +in 1623-204 Steinbrückenhöhle which were good candiates for linking in with 1623-290 Fischgesicht. So the task is to find the +records and find out how difficult those places are to get to, and what it looks like at the exploration limit. We want to find out +about Pretzel Passage. + +

Start with the cave 1623-204 and read the cave +description.

  1. Start with the master caves list, +"Caves" on the left-hand menu on all handbook pages, +including this page you are reading now. +
  2. Find 1623-204 and click on it. It goes to /1623/204/204.html. +
  3. 204 has a cave description split up into multiple +pages, but there is "Glossary of Passage Names". So go to /1623/204/atoz.html +
  4. Under 'P' we find no passage of that name. Bother. So +this is an obscre place not in the Cave Description. +
  5. Next step is to look at all the survex files. +
  6. Go back to the Cave Description page and find the +heading "Survex File(s)" and click on "All survexfiles for this cave". +
  7. Now do ctrl-F and search for "Pretzel" +
  8. There are two surveys: pretzelpassage1 and pretzelpassage2. +Radost said it was pretzelpassage2. +
  9. We can see already that it was Becka and Anthony Day who surveyed it on 27th Aug.2012, and that the raw data is in survey wallet 2012#45. +
  10. Click on pretzelpassage2 to read the survex file. +
  11. Bother, the survex file has no cave description in it, whcih is what we were hoping for. +
  12. OK, look at the raw notes in the survey wallet 2012#45 +
  13. The wallet metadata tells us that the W tick-box is green, which means that either there was no cave description in the survex file +or that there was and it had been copied into the website cave description page: red means 'un-finished business'. +
  14. We see a red box for "T" which means this trip has not been '"Tunneled" (or "Therioned"), or if it has, nobody has recorded it. +
  15. We see that a Plan exists (green box) but no Elevation (red box). +
  16. In the file list in the middle of the page we can see plan1.jpg and plan2.jpg. Click on them. +
  17. Aha! "Stones rattle, sounds of water" that sounds like the lead we are looking for.. +
  18. Now we check through all the other data we have on things that happened on the same day. It is at the botoom of the page. +
  19. Aha Again! A logbook entry " 204 - Survey Pretzl Passage below Big Boulder Chamber + +continue derig" +
  20. Click on it, and we at last find the passage description that we wanted. Which coupled with the hand-drawin plan sketches in the +wallet is all that we needed. +
+
Go on to: Troggle architecture