mirror of
https://expo.survex.com/repositories/expoweb/.git/
synced 2024-11-26 01:01:58 +00:00
Links to other pages doing similar things
This commit is contained in:
parent
e6ec14fb42
commit
c983091fce
@ -43,7 +43,13 @@ but now we are just going to use standard HTML5 tags.
|
||||
Click here if no todo list appears here (because 'frames' have been disabled).</div></a>
|
||||
<hr>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<h3>Other coding To Do things</h3>
|
||||
<p>See also these long-running issues which have their own 'to do' implications:
|
||||
<ol>
|
||||
<li><a href="/handbook/troggle/trogdesign.html">What Troggle Does Badly - Design Decisions</a>
|
||||
<li><a href="/handbook/troggle/menudesign.html">New Menu System</a>
|
||||
<li><a href="/handbook/troggle/trog2030.html">Troggle in 2025-2030</a>
|
||||
</ol>
|
||||
<h3>Process Documentation</h3>
|
||||
<details><summary><!--2020-03-26 psargent-->Wallets and new-cave</summary>
|
||||
<li><!--2020-03-26 psargent-->Explain how to link a new cave into the other caves in
|
||||
|
@ -68,11 +68,43 @@ all the multi-user non-interference, not Django. So unless we want to roll our o
|
||||
<div style="color:blue">
|
||||
<p>We need to de-cruft troggle *first*: remove 'good ideas' which were never used, trim redundancies and generally reduce it in size significantly.
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
We should have a good look at making a list of functions that we will drop and some we replace by parsing cavern output and some we calculate during importing/reading svx files.
|
||||
We should have a good look at making a list of functions that we will drop and some we replace by parsing cavern output and some we calculate
|
||||
during importing/reading svx files.
|
||||
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
Documentation and a working list of on-going programming projects is the key to keeping troggle in a state where someone can pick it up and do a useful week's work, e.g. extracting the parsed logbooks to use shelve() storage throughout instead of SQL. The next time someone like Radost comes along during the next 5 years we want to be able to use them effectively.
|
||||
Documentation and a working list of on-going programming projects is the key to keeping troggle in a state where someone can pick it up and do a
|
||||
useful week's work, e.g. extracting the parsed logbooks to use shelve() storage throughout instead of SQL. The next time someone like Radost comes
|
||||
along during the next 5 years we want to be able to use them effectively.
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
|
||||
<h3>Option Zero.1</h2>
|
||||
<div style="color:blue">
|
||||
<p>We should probably review and revise all the over-complex templates, originally written in 2006, which do serious amounts of database querying,
|
||||
and linked object sub-querying, within the template code. This is a nightmare to maintain and debug, e.g. see
|
||||
the note at the bottom of <a href="/personexpedition/Wookey/1999">Wookey 1999 trips</a>.
|
||||
|
||||
<p>A possible goal would be to create all the data that will be displayed in a page as dictionaries - generated by obviously simple python, with
|
||||
some Django query optimisations if necessary - which are then handed as 'context' to the Django page template (those files in <var>
|
||||
troggle/templates/xxx.html</var>), instead of using the Django-specific database object requests within the template sublanguage, e.g.
|
||||
<code><pre>
|
||||
{% if persondate.2 %}
|
||||
<td class="survexblock"><a href="{% url "svx" persondate.2.survexfile.path %}">{{persondate.2.name}}</a></td>
|
||||
{%comment%}
|
||||
<td class="roles" style="padding-right: 3px; text-align:right">
|
||||
{% for survexpersonrole in persondate.2.survexpersonrole_set.all %}
|
||||
{{survexpersonrole.nrole}}
|
||||
{% endfor %}
|
||||
</td>{%endcomment%}
|
||||
<td style="text-align:right">
|
||||
{{persondate.2.legslength|stringformat:".1f"}} m
|
||||
</td>
|
||||
{% else %}
|
||||
<td colspan="3"> </td>
|
||||
{% endif %}
|
||||
</pre></code>
|
||||
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
|
||||
<h3>Things that could be a bit sticky 1 - multi-user safety</h3>
|
||||
<p>Multi-user synchronous use could be a bit tricky without a solid multi-user database sitting behind the python code. So removing all the SQL database use may not be what we want to do after all.
|
||||
<p>Under all conceivable circumstances we would continue to use WGSI or
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user