diff --git a/cave_data/1623-224.html b/cave_data/1623-224.html
index e219e93f6..bfeff9bf8 100644
--- a/cave_data/1623-224.html
+++ b/cave_data/1623-224.html
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
False
1623-224
-Toplesscayonhöhle
+Toplesscanyonhöhle
1623
2d
1/S +
diff --git a/noinfo/cave-number-index b/noinfo/cave-number-index
index a3b899aa4..77391f205 100644
--- a/noinfo/cave-number-index
+++ b/noinfo/cave-number-index
@@ -232,10 +232,10 @@
218 Hammerkopfabsturtzhöhle
219 Tertaeingfester
220 Kennedy Alternative
-221 ? seems no record of this on site
+221 Kugelmühle
222 Gösserhöhle
223 Eggenbergschacht
-224 Toplesscayonhöhle (typo for Toplesscanyonhöhle?)
+224 Toplesscanyonhöhle
225 Jahrzehnschacht
226 Skaschacht
227 Faultienschacht
@@ -281,18 +281,18 @@
286 Radschlaghöhle
287 Nach Osten Gefahren Höhle
288 Lila Lupinenhöhle
+289 Höhle der guten Hoffnung
290 Fischgesicht Höhle
291 Glückliche Schmetterlingshöhle
+292 Motte Höhle
293 Blocklufthöhle
294 Rhabarberhöhle
-298 Zufall Schacht
-
+295 Keine Wassermelone Höhle
+296 Doppel Gemse Höhle
+297 Haizahnhöhle
+298 Zufallsschacht
(d) our internal numbers. When given full kataster status, => official number
- otherwise, these caves are awaiting submission to Robert. We (try to) say elsewhere how complete the documentation is,
- as part of a drive to identify caves we actually could submit to Robert. Depressingly few...
- The other motivation for this file is to identify gaps in numbering that imply finds which are so poorly recorded that
- there is nothing in the Prospecting guide saying what needs doing !
1977/11 expo.survex.com/years/1988/164.htm refers to this number, which is almost certainly 1976-B11
(1987-01 might be 199 Stürzender Felsbrocken Höhle but web page doesn't say. This is just an AERW memory to remind me to check logbook)
@@ -493,7 +493,7 @@
2012-ns-03 Slime Cave
2012-ns-09 Bergspitze Schacht
2012-ns-10 Kleine Baum Höhle
-2012-ns-13 Moth Cave
+2012-ns-13 => 1623/292 Motte Cave
2014-NEO-01 => 1623/273 Ferkelhöhle
2014-ms-14 => 1623/287 Nach Osten Gefahren Höhle
2014-SD-01 => 1623/274
@@ -508,7 +508,7 @@ A1 CUCC 1976/A1
B1 CUCC 1976/B1
B2 CUCC 1976/B2
B3 CUCC 1976/B3
-B4 CUCC 1976/B4 his is easy to finf, and ought to be easy to survey. For fuck sake get rid of it !
+B4 CUCC 1976/B4 this is easy to find, and ought to be easy to survey. For fuck sake get rid of it !
B5 CUCC 1976/B5 conceivably => 1623/35
B6 CUCC 1976/B6
B7 CUCC 1976/B7
diff --git a/noinfo/katasterable-or-not b/noinfo/katasterable-or-not
index 4427078e9..5a4391a23 100644
--- a/noinfo/katasterable-or-not
+++ b/noinfo/katasterable-or-not
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ LA40 missing, unsurveyed, untagged, but given a lat/long probably from the
2001-11 needs survey, or might be too short for kataster
2001-12 needs survey - may be a VfHM cave
2002-03 needs survey and entrance photo
-2002-05 have svx, not in PG. ent coords in 2006#1
+2002-05 have svx, not in PG. ent coords in 2006#1 # now in kataster as 1623/294
2002-06 surveyed, but drawing lost - may be too short for a kataster number. ent coords in 2006#1
2002-07 have svx, not in PG
2002-08 surveyed, but drawing lost. May be pushed by small chemical persuasion
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ LA40 missing, unsurveyed, untagged, but given a lat/long probably from the
2006-06 surveyed, but drawing lost. ent coords in 2006#1
2006-07 needs survey and entrance photo
2006-08 needs survey and entrance photo - svx ? wallet 2007#31 seems to be grade 1 plan and elev but 2006#33 may be actual survey (2 legs)
-2006-09 needs survey
+2006-09 needs survey # Now kataster-numbered as 1623/298
2006-70 surveyed, but drawing lost, needs tag
2006-71 not in PG. see wallet 2006#16
2006-72 surveyed, but drawing lost