diff --git a/cave_data/1623-224.html b/cave_data/1623-224.html index e219e93f6..bfeff9bf8 100644 --- a/cave_data/1623-224.html +++ b/cave_data/1623-224.html @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ False 1623-224 -Toplesscayonhöhle +Toplesscanyonhöhle 1623 2d 1/S + diff --git a/noinfo/cave-number-index b/noinfo/cave-number-index index a3b899aa4..77391f205 100644 --- a/noinfo/cave-number-index +++ b/noinfo/cave-number-index @@ -232,10 +232,10 @@ 218 Hammerkopfabsturtzhöhle 219 Tertaeingfester 220 Kennedy Alternative -221 ? seems no record of this on site +221 Kugelmühle 222 Gösserhöhle 223 Eggenbergschacht -224 Toplesscayonhöhle (typo for Toplesscanyonhöhle?) +224 Toplesscanyonhöhle 225 Jahrzehnschacht 226 Skaschacht 227 Faultienschacht @@ -281,18 +281,18 @@ 286 Radschlaghöhle 287 Nach Osten Gefahren Höhle 288 Lila Lupinenhöhle +289 Höhle der guten Hoffnung 290 Fischgesicht Höhle 291 Glückliche Schmetterlingshöhle +292 Motte Höhle 293 Blocklufthöhle 294 Rhabarberhöhle -298 Zufall Schacht - +295 Keine Wassermelone Höhle +296 Doppel Gemse Höhle +297 Haizahnhöhle +298 Zufallsschacht (d) our internal numbers. When given full kataster status, => official number - otherwise, these caves are awaiting submission to Robert. We (try to) say elsewhere how complete the documentation is, - as part of a drive to identify caves we actually could submit to Robert. Depressingly few... - The other motivation for this file is to identify gaps in numbering that imply finds which are so poorly recorded that - there is nothing in the Prospecting guide saying what needs doing ! 1977/11 expo.survex.com/years/1988/164.htm refers to this number, which is almost certainly 1976-B11 (1987-01 might be 199 Stürzender Felsbrocken Höhle but web page doesn't say. This is just an AERW memory to remind me to check logbook) @@ -493,7 +493,7 @@ 2012-ns-03 Slime Cave 2012-ns-09 Bergspitze Schacht 2012-ns-10 Kleine Baum Höhle -2012-ns-13 Moth Cave +2012-ns-13 => 1623/292 Motte Cave 2014-NEO-01 => 1623/273 Ferkelhöhle 2014-ms-14 => 1623/287 Nach Osten Gefahren Höhle 2014-SD-01 => 1623/274 @@ -508,7 +508,7 @@ A1 CUCC 1976/A1 B1 CUCC 1976/B1 B2 CUCC 1976/B2 B3 CUCC 1976/B3 -B4 CUCC 1976/B4 his is easy to finf, and ought to be easy to survey. For fuck sake get rid of it ! +B4 CUCC 1976/B4 this is easy to find, and ought to be easy to survey. For fuck sake get rid of it ! B5 CUCC 1976/B5 conceivably => 1623/35 B6 CUCC 1976/B6 B7 CUCC 1976/B7 diff --git a/noinfo/katasterable-or-not b/noinfo/katasterable-or-not index 4427078e9..5a4391a23 100644 --- a/noinfo/katasterable-or-not +++ b/noinfo/katasterable-or-not @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ LA40 missing, unsurveyed, untagged, but given a lat/long probably from the 2001-11 needs survey, or might be too short for kataster 2001-12 needs survey - may be a VfHM cave 2002-03 needs survey and entrance photo -2002-05 have svx, not in PG. ent coords in 2006#1 +2002-05 have svx, not in PG. ent coords in 2006#1 # now in kataster as 1623/294 2002-06 surveyed, but drawing lost - may be too short for a kataster number. ent coords in 2006#1 2002-07 have svx, not in PG 2002-08 surveyed, but drawing lost. May be pushed by small chemical persuasion @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ LA40 missing, unsurveyed, untagged, but given a lat/long probably from the 2006-06 surveyed, but drawing lost. ent coords in 2006#1 2006-07 needs survey and entrance photo 2006-08 needs survey and entrance photo - svx ? wallet 2007#31 seems to be grade 1 plan and elev but 2006#33 may be actual survey (2 legs) -2006-09 needs survey +2006-09 needs survey # Now kataster-numbered as 1623/298 2006-70 surveyed, but drawing lost, needs tag 2006-71 not in PG. see wallet 2006#16 2006-72 surveyed, but drawing lost