[svn r3789] Converted all gifs to pngs.

This commit is contained in:
mark
2001-08-16 14:43:09 +02:00
parent 0f88ab480a
commit a6926e8232
1134 changed files with 7001 additions and 7001 deletions

View File

@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ arrival I left the unit in the sunshine for 4 hours plotting the position of
basecamp. Slowly a track was built up wandering around in a big blob around
the campsite.
<Center><IMG SRC="img171.gif">
<Center><IMG SRC="img171.png">
<P>Five-hour GPS plot showing how the readings wander, and that the geometric
mean is likely to be a better position estimate than any of the individual
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ minutes it usually improved to be within the correct area. You can tell this
once you have a few waypoints marked because you get a line on the map screen
zooming in from way over to one side.
<Center><IMG SRC="img173.gif"><br>Figure 1
<Center><IMG SRC="img173.png"><br>Figure 1
showing how the first couple of readings after getting a fix can be
several hundred metres off.</Center>
@@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ give better results, but it depends how good the surface survey is.
<P>So, after a great deal of head-scratching I have a pair of columns on my
spreadsheet giving co-ordinates in G&amp;K (Austrian Cavers) co-ordinates. It
looks like this, showing the actual data and (boxed) the averaged
results:<IMG SRC="img174.gif">The co-ordinate pairs are: decimalised
results:<IMG SRC="img174.png">The co-ordinate pairs are: decimalised
Lat./Long., interpolated G&amp;K, offset 'Austrian' G&amp;K, GPS calculated
G&amp;K (note X&amp;Y reversed on these, cos that's the way the GPS displays
them).
@@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ better than the waypoint results.
<P>Here is typical example of the results:
<P><IMG SRC="img175.gif"><br>Figure 2
<P><IMG SRC="img175.png"><br>Figure 2
showing 5 fixes for entrance 161d, and the 5 corresponding averaged
positions.
@@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ behaviour that means a GPS reading alone can be thoroughly misleading. The
bar on the left shows the 100m limit, and the readings are nearly all with in
this, although not quite.
<P><IMG SRC="img176.gif"><br>Figure 3, showing the area
<P><IMG SRC="img176.png"><br>Figure 3, showing the area
of the plateau near top camp with surface surveys and GPS positions.
<P>I have selected a number of locations, the corresponding GPS waypoint, and
@@ -452,25 +452,25 @@ life significantly easier for this sort of work.
<HR>
<!-- LINKS -->
<img alt="&gt;" src="../../../icons/lists/0.gif">
<img alt="&gt;" src="../../../icons/lists/0.png">
1996 Expedition info:<br>
<img alt="---&gt;" src="../../../icons/lists/1.gif">
<img alt="---&gt;" src="../../../icons/lists/1.png">
<a href="index.htm">Index</a> (more detail than in this list)<br>
<img alt="---&gt;" src="../../../icons/lists/1.gif">
<img alt="---&gt;" src="../../../icons/lists/1.png">
<a href="log.htm">Logbook</a><br>
<img alt="---&gt;" src="../../../icons/lists/1.gif">
<img alt="---&gt;" src="../../../icons/lists/1.png">
<a href="excsrp.htm">Preliminary report</a> (exCS newsletter)<br>
<img alt="---&gt;" src="../../../icons/lists/1.gif">
<img alt="---&gt;" src="../../../icons/lists/1.png">
<a href="report.htm">Cambridge Underground report</a><br>
<img alt="---&gt;" src="../../../icons/lists/1.gif">
<img alt="---&gt;" src="../../../icons/lists/1.png">
<a href="bcracc.htm">BCRA Caves and Caving</a> Report<br>
<img alt="---&gt;" src="../../../icons/lists/1.gif">
<img alt="---&gt;" src="../../../icons/lists/1.png">
This year's <a href="sponsr.htm">Sponsors</a><br>
<img alt="&gt;" src="../../../icons/lists/0.gif">
<img alt="&gt;" src="../../../icons/lists/0.png">
<a href="../../pubs.htm#1996">Published accounts</a><br>
<img alt="&gt;" src="../../../icons/lists/0.gif">
<img alt="&gt;" src="../../../icons/lists/0.png">
<a href="../../index.htm">Back to Expedition intro page</a><br>
<img alt="&gt;" src="../../../icons/lists/0.gif">
<img alt="&gt;" src="../../../icons/lists/0.png">
<A href="../../../index.htm">CUCC Home page</a>
</body>