From 94fa429ad378aa91f302faaed8670434550fbaa8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Philip Sargent <philip.sargent@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 13:18:14 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] QM  documn.

---
 handbook/survey/qm.html | 39 ++++++++++++++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/handbook/survey/qm.html b/handbook/survey/qm.html
index bb8e52a1d..6e5ca0043 100644
--- a/handbook/survey/qm.html
+++ b/handbook/survey/qm.html
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
 where we store QMs in the survex files, see
 <ul>
 <li><a href="qmentry.html">QM data and cave descriptions</a>
-<li><a href="newsurvex.html#tickqm">Entering the QM data</a>
+<li><a href="qmentry.html#tick">QM - ticking off</a>
 <li>Only if really keen: <a href="../troggle/scriptsqms.html">QMs - the fourfold path</a>
 </ul>
 
@@ -34,22 +34,16 @@ QM is in the description, or the description doesn't yet exist :-).</p>
 
 <h2>Quality grades</h2>
 
-<dl>
-  <dt>A</dt>
-  <dd>A fine QM - go down there and look. </dd>
-  <dt>B</dt>
-  <dd>Not so promising, or requiring some effort (eg. a climb) </dd>
-  <dt>C</dt>
-  <dd>Pretty cruddy, or good but very hard to get to.</dd>
-  <dt>D</dt>
-  <dd>A dig- only possible to continue if loose rocks or soil are removed.</dd>
-  <dt>V</dt>
-  <dd>An aven which might be climbable, but not adequately assessed</dd>
-  <dt>X</dt>
-  <dd>A high, wet or unsafe-looking aven unlikely to be climbed</dd>
-  <dt>?</dt>
-  <dd>No-one writing this list actually knows!</dd>
-</dl>
+<p><b>A</b> - A fine QM - go down there and look.
+<p><b>B</b> - Not so promising, or requiring some effort (eg. a climb).
+<p><b>C</b> - Pretty cruddy, or good but very hard to get to.
+<p><b>D</b> - A dig only possible to continue if loose rocks or soil are removed.
+<p><b>X</b> - A high, wet or unsafe-looking aven unlikely to be climbed
+
+<br /><br />
+<p>And we used to have (no longer used):
+<p><b>V</b> - An aven which might be climbable, but not adequately assessed (use C or X instead, with comment)
+<p><b>?</b> - Unknown - origin lost in history.
 
 <p>Note that the quality grades are assigned by the explorers at the time, and 
 that subsequent discoveries may mean that the grade is optimistic, since the 
@@ -59,14 +53,9 @@ may be another's "C-lead" :-(</p>
 
 <h2>Discoverer identifiers</h2>
 <p>In past years, we used to add into the QM identifier an indication of who discovered it. This is no longer used.
-<dl>
-  <dt>A</dt>
-  <dd>ARGE</dd>
-  <dt>B</dt>
-  <dd>Groupe Sp&eacute;l&eacute;o de Clerval - Baume les Dames </dd>
-  <dt>C</dt>
-  <dd>Cambridge University Caving Club</dd>
-</dl>
+<p><b>A</b> - ARGE.
+<p><b>B</b> - Groupe Sp&eacute;l&eacute;o de Clerval - Baume les Dames.
+<p><b>C</b> - Cambridge University Caving Club - Expo.
 
 <hr />
 Go to <a href="qmentry.html">Adding QMs to survex</a></body>