expo/expoweb
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://expo.survex.com/repositories/expoweb/.git/ synced 2025-12-08 14:54:28 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[svn r5960] 2000-08, 2000-09, and 2002-01 moved home.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
sb476
2004-05-06 23:30:48 +02:00
parent 95f0cad7c7
commit 63803041f2
3 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
handbook/cockup.htm
View File

@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ a real number. The other is really 186, whose marking was later
fixed.</td></tr>
<tr><td>234, 235</td><td><p>After the switch over to the new system whereby caves are given official numbers only on receipt of a form and survey, these numbers were used without permission for two caves in the vicinity of Eish&ouml;hle, on the grounds that it was highly unlikely that the numbers would be used by anyone else before the forms got sent in; the caves were thus tagged as such. However, the forms disappeared into the ether after being mistakenly posted to AERW instead of the Austrians.</p>
<p>Later, when the next batch of caves were submitted to the Austrians for numbering, 235 was allocated to <a href="../smkridge/2000-09/2000-09.htm">Hauchh&ouml;hle</a> (2000-09). It is not known to what cave number 234 was actually allocated.</p>
<p>Later, when the next batch of caves were submitted to the Austrians for numbering, 235 was allocated to <a href="../smkridge/2000-09.htm">Hauchh&ouml;hle</a> (2000-09). It is not known to what cave number 234 was actually allocated.</p>
<p>It is intended that new kataster numbers be applied for for the caves currently tagged 234 and 235, and the tag 235 applied to Hauchh&ouml;hle, by the end of Expo 2004.</p>
</td></tr>