From 541256ddfb41fdad8b37221d9b2cd96ca54b6f7f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Philip Sargent Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 15:33:04 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Online edit of entrance 1626-2019-HT-02 --- cave_data/1626-2019-HT-02.html | 4 ++-- entrance_data/1626-2019-HT-02.html | 21 ++++++++++++++++++--- 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/cave_data/1626-2019-HT-02.html b/cave_data/1626-2019-HT-02.html index 3099a3bb0..cdfadd147 100644 --- a/cave_data/1626-2019-HT-02.html +++ b/cave_data/1626-2019-HT-02.html @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ - + -This file is generated by troggle on Oct. 16, 2023, 11:34 a.m. UTC using the form documented at +This file is generated by troggle on Oct. 20, 2023, 3:33 p.m. UTC using the form documented at the form documented at handbook/survey/caveentry.html
diff --git a/entrance_data/1626-2019-HT-02.html b/entrance_data/1626-2019-HT-02.html index b23d8c137..c42515c29 100644 --- a/entrance_data/1626-2019-HT-02.html +++ b/entrance_data/1626-2019-HT-02.html @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ - + @@ -14,14 +14,29 @@ though, you do not need to do a data import as it happens automatically --> -This file is generated by troggle on Oct. 16, 2023, 11:34 a.m. UTC using the form documented at +This file is generated by troggle on Oct. 20, 2023, 3:33 p.m. UTC using the form documented at handbook/survey/ententry.html
False 1626-2019-HT-02 - +Daniel Ginger Heins: +
[pit] should be >10' if I recall right, so I would've thought that would've been well identifiable but point taken that in practice it doesn't seem to be as clear as I was thinking it'd be (assuming the "west of homecoming" is accurate)
+
+47.696565, 13.803737 
+https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=1f7cf2d0-63be-488c-bed6-7f521a459f8f&cp=47.69654%7E13.803728&lvl=20.4&style=h&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027
+
+That might be it but I can't say for sure if that's actually a hole or just a cliff shadow.  But nonetheless, it'd be that sort of feature - a shadow of a hole on a decent size slab of pavement.
+
+
+I do think I remember clambering up the boulder on the north end of that slab, which is a decently positive sign but can't 100% say that those were the same slabs
+
+if I had to guess this might be the other complex [Boop-da-etc] , it matches my rough recollections and notes but obviously isn't as distinct as the other 
+https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=6c43eb16-8ec7-46a4-9557-083976268780&cp=47.697241~13.801916&lvl=19.845789&style=h&pi=0&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027
+
+(that's low confidence, but it at least is a near-ish patch of exposed limestone with a cliff  around half of it. the entrances wold not be as clear since they'd be obscured by cliff shadows)
+