expo/expoweb
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://expo.survex.com/repositories/expoweb/.git/ synced 2025-12-08 14:54:28 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[svn r7510] ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Browse Source 
r10764:  expo | 2006-07-25 08:50:34 +0100

Correct explanation of the 234, etc fuckup
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This commit is contained in:
olly
2006-09-07 04:25:52 +02:00
parent 17a706e17a
commit 4fc8bb7cbf
1 changed files with 7 additions and 1 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
handbook/cockup.htm
View File

@@ -63,7 +63,13 @@ correctly numbered 185, there were <b>two</b> other caves erroneously
numbered "185", one of which is undocumented 90/15, which needs surveying and
a real number. The other is really 186, whose marking was later
fixed.</td></tr>
<tr><td>232 - 238</td><td><p>After the switch over to the new system whereby caves are given official numbers only on receipt of a form and survey, the numbers 232-5 were used for caves in the vicinity of Eish&ouml;hle, on the grounds that it was highly unlikely that the numbers would be used by anyone else before the forms got sent in; the caves were thus tagged as such. However, the forms disappeared into the ether after being mistakenly posted to AERW instead of the Austrians.</p>
<tr><td>232 - 238</td><td><p>After the switch over to the new system whereby
caves are given official numbers only on receipt of a form and survey, the
numbers 232-5 were used for caves in the vicinity of Eish&ouml;hle, after
Robert Seebacher told us we'd be allocated these numbers so long as we got the
forms to him promptly. However, the forms were mistakenly posted to AERW
instead of the Austrians, so Robert not unreasonably allocated the numbers to
other caves.</p>
<p>This led to some discrepancies between the Austrian's numbering and ours; these were resolved by an allocation of new numbers in 2004, detailed <a href="../years/2004/kataster2004.html">here</a>. Some old documents and survey notes may be rather confusing on this point!</p>
</td></tr>