expo/expoweb
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://expo.survex.com/repositories/expoweb/.git/ synced 2024-11-22 07:11:55 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Remove duplicate '76', so 106 should just point to entry for 76.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Wookey 2020-06-07 02:53:56 +01:00
parent 538c748968
commit 45a29e91f9
1 changed files with 7 additions and 6 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

13
cave_data/1623-106.html
View File

@ -9,12 +9,11 @@
<cave> <cave>
<non_public>False</non_public> <non_public>False</non_public>
<caveslug>1623-106</caveslug> <caveslug>1623-106</caveslug>
<official_name>Eislufthohle</official_name> <official_name></official_name>
<area>1623</area> <area>1623</area>
<area>1d</area> <area>1d</area>
<kataster_code>5/S/E x</kataster_code> <kataster_number>106</kataster_number>
<kataster_number>76</kataster_number> <unofficial_number>Numbering cock-up for 76</unofficial_number>
<unofficial_number>106</unofficial_number>
<entrance> <entrance>
<entranceslug>1623-106</entranceslug> <entranceslug>1623-106</entranceslug>
@ -28,13 +27,15 @@
<survey></survey> <survey></survey>
<kataster_status></kataster_status> <kataster_status></kataster_status>
<underground_centre_line></underground_centre_line> <underground_centre_line></underground_centre_line>
<notes></notes> <notes>106 is not a cave - the number was accidentally used by CUCC
for Eislufth&ouml;hle (76) for a while. But we reverted to the
Austrian Kataster numbering once the confusion was discovered.</notes>
<length></length> <length></length>
<depth></depth> <depth></depth>
<extent></extent> <extent></extent>
<survex_file></survex_file> <survex_file></survex_file>
<description_file></description_file> <description_file></description_file>
<url>1623/76/76.html</url> <url>1623/76/76.htm</url>
</cave> </cave>
</body> </body>
</html> </html>