expo/expoweb
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://expo.survex.com/repositories/expoweb/.git/ synced 2024-11-22 07:11:55 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

UTF error

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Philip Sargent 2021-04-20 22:57:35 +01:00
parent bc1c180b44
commit 400464abc0
1 changed files with 6 additions and 6 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

12
years/2003/logbook.html
View File

@ -849,18 +849,18 @@ the trees (actually easy) as it looked more open up there. This
soon hit a much bigger track which we identified on the map,
dropping to a point with a quarried (?) section on a corner. (Again
this is marked on the map.)</p>
<p>Consulting the map, we identified Hütteneckalm as a next
<p>Consulting the map, we identified Hütteneckalm as a next
possible target. We actually soon saw this alm, from our newfound
path, and it was immediately obvious that it was the intended
destination. However, it was not obvious as to how to reach it.
Despite it being a relatively small horizontal distance away - and
not very much higher than us - a big stream valley was in the way.
The alternative route would have been to go back to Pitzingalm and
then to Hüttenbachalm via the Lambacherhütte path (201). However,
then to Hüttenbachalm via the Lambacherhütte path (201). However,
the latter was too far - it being nearly 6pm - so we decided to
descend down the current path and then thrash directly up a stream
(!) (Mark's idea - Olly) which would then lead directly to
Hütteneckalm. Thankfully common sense got the better of us, and
Hütteneckalm. Thankfully common sense got the better of us, and
when we spotted a path on the other (south) side of the stream
which we were descending towards, we followed it - despite the map
showing it ending some way from our destination. However, from that
@ -887,11 +887,11 @@ lights.</p>
<p>The options were two: either to return down the tiny path,
thence go (up!) to Pitzingalm and back the way we had come
originally to that point. Alternatively, we could go on the main
path to the Lambacher Hütte, thence to Vorderer Sandlingalm and
path to the Lambacher Hütte, thence to Vorderer Sandlingalm and
then to Sandlingalm, to rejoin the route we'd come on at the
junction where we had previously turned off to Pitzingalm.</p>
<p>Given the situation we decided on this second option, as it
would keep us on major paths. We headed to the top of Hütteneckalm
would keep us on major paths. We headed to the top of Hütteneckalm
to start off. There, we found a couple of huts and a Gasthof(!) -
plus several cars. There were many merry people being amused
outside the Gasthof by a gentleman in some weird garb which I
@ -900,7 +900,7 @@ another occasion by road if possible - drinking bier up there would
be entertaining adn the place also has FANTASTIC views of the
Dachstein range. Would be well worth photographing, when the sun's
in the right direction (early morning maybe? not sure).</p>
<p>And so we set off, climbing to reach the Lambacherhütte after
<p>And so we set off, climbing to reach the Lambacherhütte after
quite a lot of path. Took about 50 minutes. Still light. Continued
down to Vorderer Sandlingalm, by which time a sunset was starting -
nice clouds in the sky (see photo on website). From here, the path