From 3cae883304b5903aa032dc4d9f830dfd7794efba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Philip Sargent <philip.sargent@klebos.com> Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2021 16:20:45 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] moe QM bits --- handbook/survey/qm.html | 4 ++-- handbook/survey/qmentry.html | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/handbook/survey/qm.html b/handbook/survey/qm.html index 728692463..6808bceed 100644 --- a/handbook/survey/qm.html +++ b/handbook/survey/qm.html @@ -27,8 +27,8 @@ its "<cavenumber>." prefix) is included in an html comment for almost all leads.]</p> <p>In general, an unpushed QM will have a link from its QM number in the -cave description file to the list (generated by a perl script), and a link from the list to the relevant point in the -description. If there is no link, it means that I can't yet work out where the +cave description file to the HTML QM list file (generated by a perl script for caves 204, 234 and 258), and a link from the list to the relevant point in the +description. If there is no link, it means that we can't yet work out where the QM is in the description, or the description doesn't yet exist :-).</p> <h2>Discoverer identifiers</h2> diff --git a/handbook/survey/qmentry.html b/handbook/survey/qmentry.html index 1bd59e4b0..6483739f5 100644 --- a/handbook/survey/qmentry.html +++ b/handbook/survey/qmentry.html @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ The format for question mark lists is <br> <li><a href="qm.html">Discoverer identifier</a>, <li>Year of discovery, <li>Cave identifier, <li>serial number. </ul> but today, with the QMs inside the survex files, the identifiers are just QM1, QM2 etc. -<p>This format is <a href="../../qm.html">documented in the original QM conventions</a> page (which now needs revising). +<p>This format is <a href="qm.html">documented in the original QM conventions</a> page. <p> The example below demonstrates correct and effective use of the QM list referring back to earlier elements in the svx file: