diff --git a/cave_data/1623-228.html b/cave_data/1623-228.html index 646b3c98c..6b6565030 100644 --- a/cave_data/1623-228.html +++ b/cave_data/1623-228.html @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ - + -This file is generated by troggle on July 12, 2024, 5:57 p.m. UTC using the form documented at +This file is generated by troggle on July 12, 2024, 5:58 p.m. UTC using the form documented at the form documented at handbook/survey/caveentry.html
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ code used in the Austrian kataster e.g '1/S +' - https://expo/.survex.com/katast Is this possibly the same as 114 ?

NOTE The shape, length and orientation of the cave is very suspiciously similar to the explored but not surveyed 1623-114 which is very close (60m) to Schnellzughohle and does indeed look like a smaller version of Schnellzughohle. So is the survey location of 1623-228 in Egglgrube valley incorrect ? It uses the nils2000 fixed point *fix 1000 -

The location of this entrance is just above the edge of the cliff, whcih is in thick impenetrable pine scrub (failed visit 11th July 2024)

Click for larger image
+

The location of this entrance is just above the edge of the cliff, which is in thick impenetrable pine scrub (failed visit 11th July 2024), whcih is another reason to be suspicious.

Click for larger image