From 345387755986102c8eeb88c3dd0777452b5fb622 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Expo on server Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 19:06:26 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] moved tick header - online edit of handbook/survey/qmentry.html --- handbook/survey/qmentry.html | 26 ++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/handbook/survey/qmentry.html b/handbook/survey/qmentry.html index f5180328a..aa0e80171 100644 --- a/handbook/survey/qmentry.html +++ b/handbook/survey/qmentry.html @@ -113,6 +113,16 @@ handbook page.

+

+If these data are not entered along with the rest of the survey data, it is as if you decided not to enter +some of the actual passage data you surveyed: information is being lost and someone will have to +trawl back through all the survey data at a later time to keep it up-to-date, a very tedious task which +is a very inefficient use of time. +

Also if the person reading it hasn't been to the bit of cave (which is, like, the whole point, then the +data has a higher chance of being incorrect. It is not always easy to interpret Tunnel or Therion drawings correctly +with this sort of thing. +

Ticking off a QM

+ Below is part of the current template file (square brackets must be removed as real content replaces template text):

;-----------
@@ -136,16 +146,8 @@ real content replaces template text):

 ;Serial number TICK  date resolution description
 ;[QM2 TICK 2022-07-20 This is an example ticked QM]
-

-If these data are not entered along with the rest of the survey data, it is as if you decided not to enter -some of the actual passage data you surveyed: information is being lost and someone will have to -trawl back through all the survey data at a later time to keep it up-to-date, a very tedious task which -is a very inefficient use of time. -

Also if the person reading it hasn't been to the bit of cave (which is, like, the whole point, then the -data has a higher chance of being incorrect. It is not always easy to interpret Tunnel or Therion drawings correctly -with this sort of thing. -

Ticking off a QM

+

Since 2015 we have had no generally-agreed, well-documented or widely-practiced way of recording whether a QM has been ticked-off or not.

In the past, this was done by @@ -184,9 +186,5 @@ development in our online systems. The current status is Survey handbook - survex format".

- - - - +

Return to "Survey handbook - survex format".