From 24c12efa5617c369d5e4a6a35ed81c8600a9aed0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Philip Sargent <philip.sargent@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 12:26:37 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] QM grades --- handbook/survey/qm.html | 24 ++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/handbook/survey/qm.html b/handbook/survey/qm.html index 2db4bf1ae..bb8e52a1d 100644 --- a/handbook/survey/qm.html +++ b/handbook/survey/qm.html @@ -30,21 +30,13 @@ cave description file to the HTML QM list file (generated by a perl script for c description. If there is no link, it means that we can't yet work out where the QM is in the description, or the description doesn't yet exist :-).</p> -<h2>Discoverer identifiers</h2> -<dl> - <dt>A</dt> - <dd>ARGE</dd> - <dt>B</dt> - <dd>Groupe Spéléo de Clerval - Baume les Dames </dd> - <dt>C</dt> - <dd>Cambridge University Caving Club</dd> -</dl> + <h2>Quality grades</h2> <dl> <dt>A</dt> - <dd>A fine QM - git down there and look. </dd> + <dd>A fine QM - go down there and look. </dd> <dt>B</dt> <dd>Not so promising, or requiring some effort (eg. a climb) </dd> <dt>C</dt> @@ -64,6 +56,18 @@ that subsequent discoveries may mean that the grade is optimistic, since the lead may now drop into passage which wasn't then explored. Also, different explorers have different ideas, or different waist sizes - one man's "A-lead" may be another's "C-lead" :-(</p> + +<h2>Discoverer identifiers</h2> +<p>In past years, we used to add into the QM identifier an indication of who discovered it. This is no longer used. +<dl> + <dt>A</dt> + <dd>ARGE</dd> + <dt>B</dt> + <dd>Groupe Spéléo de Clerval - Baume les Dames </dd> + <dt>C</dt> + <dd>Cambridge University Caving Club</dd> +</dl> + <hr /> Go to <a href="qmentry.html">Adding QMs to survex</a></body> </html>