../others edits

cave_data/1623-156.html

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
 <underground_description>An open rift with a rock bridge. Pitch of 25m drops onto snow bank, and route to southeast of this drops a further 15m to a complete choke with snow.</underground_description>
 <equipment></equipment>
 <references></references>
-<survey></p><div class="centre"><img alt="Map+survey" width="620" height="336" src="../others/156.png" /></div><p>Grade 1 plan/elev of 156 and T.B.H. from <a href="../../years/1987/log.htm">1987 Log Book</a></survey>
+<survey></p><div class="centre"><img alt="Map+survey" width="620" height="336" src="/1623/others/156.png" /></div><p>Grade 1 plan/elev of 156 and T.B.H. from <a href="../../years/1987/log.htm">1987 Log Book</a></survey>
 <kataster_status></kataster_status>
 <underground_centre_line></underground_centre_line>
 <notes>The <a href="../../years/1987/log.htm">log book</a> refers to exploration in the vicinity of 0/1 including 156 and a nearby cave (unnumbered in 1987) <a href="../199.htm">Tumbling Boulder Hole</a>. There is, however, another piece of paper which says it is very near (and NE of) point 0/2. This appears to arise from the diagram which accompanies the log book entry, which shows 0/2 with no north arrow, and uphill up the page. If the point was really 0/1 on this diagram, then the descriptions would match, with north at 7 O'Clock on the diagram. The logbook suggests that the discoverers had visited 0/2 (and found very little nearby) and then 0/1 later, finding 156. GPS location and later a surface survey (1998) confirms that 0/1 is the correct laser point.</notes>