expo/expoweb
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://expo.survex.com/repositories/expoweb/.git/ synced 2024-11-22 07:11:55 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

2015-dl-01 not CUCC2015DL01 shagged spit hoehle

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Philip Sargent 2021-03-25 14:46:07 +00:00
parent 64fe1a1416
commit 18fac7ce65
2 changed files with 16 additions and 7 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

15
cave_data/1623-CUCC2015DL01.html → cave_data/1623-2015-dl-01.html
View File

@ -8,15 +8,15 @@
<body> <body>
<cave> <cave>
<non_public>False</non_public> <non_public>False</non_public>
<caveslug>1623-CUCC2015DL01</caveslug> <caveslug>1623-2015-dl-01</caveslug>
<official_name>Shagged Spit Hoehle</official_name> <official_name>Shagged Spit Hoehle</official_name>
<area>1623</area> <area>1623</area>
<kataster_code></kataster_code> <kataster_code></kataster_code>
<kataster_number></kataster_number> <kataster_number></kataster_number>
<unofficial_number>CUCC2015DL01</unofficial_number> <unofficial_number>2015-dl-01</unofficial_number>
<entrance> <entrance>
<entranceslug>1623-CUCC2015DL01</entranceslug> <entranceslug>1623-2015-dl-01</entranceslug>
<letter>a</letter> <letter>a</letter>
</entrance> </entrance>
@ -28,13 +28,18 @@ Matt Watson</explorers>
<survey></survey> <survey></survey>
<kataster_status></kataster_status> <kataster_status></kataster_status>
<underground_centre_line></underground_centre_line> <underground_centre_line></underground_centre_line>
<notes></notes> <notes>On 2018-06-06 04:24 +0100, Wookey wrote:
Last week the GMH centreline work was completed and checked in, and the therionising progressed a bit and we eventually (with a lot of
email) got to the bottom of the 'is Shagged Spit/GutenMorgenHoehle the same cave' mystery. Thanks to all who contributed - it was hard work, but we got there.
(The answer is no, there are two entrances, originally believed to be the same cave, the upper (tagged, explored, described, unsurveyed, unlocated, unphotoed) one is SS and the lower (explored, surveyed, photoed, undescribed, located) one is GMH).
</notes>
<length>10m</length> <length>10m</length>
<depth>7m</depth> <depth>7m</depth>
<extent></extent> <extent></extent>
<survex_file></survex_file> <survex_file></survex_file>
<description_file></description_file> <description_file></description_file>
<url>1623/cucc2015dl01</url> <url>1623/2015-dl-01</url>
</cave> </cave>
</body> </body>
</html> </html>

8
entrance_data/1623-CUCC2015DL01.html → entrance_data/1623-2015-dl-01.html
View File

@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
<body> <body>
<entrance> <entrance>
<non_public>False</non_public> <non_public>False</non_public>
<slug>1623-CUCC2015DL01</slug> <slug>1623-2015-dl-01</slug>
<name></name> <name></name>
<entrance_description>7m shaft with stone bridge across top. <entrance_description>7m shaft with stone bridge across top.
@ -16,7 +16,11 @@
<explorers>Dan Lenartowicz <explorers>Dan Lenartowicz
Matt Watson</explorers> Matt Watson</explorers>
<map_description></map_description> <map_description></map_description>
<location_description></location_description> <location_description>On 2018-06-06 04:24 +0100, Wookey wrote:
Last week the GMH centreline work was completed and checked in, and the therionising progressed a bit and we eventually (with a lot of
email) got to the bottom of the 'is Shagged Spit/GutenMorgenHoehle the same cave' mystery. Thanks to all who contributed - it was hard work, but we got there.
(The answer is no, there are two entrances, originally believed to be the same cave, the upper (tagged, explored, described, unsurveyed, unlocated, unphotoed) one is SS and the lower (explored, surveyed, photoed, undescribed, located) one is GMH).</location_description>
<approach></approach> <approach></approach>
<underground_description>p7 leads to chossy rift</underground_description> <underground_description>p7 leads to chossy rift</underground_description>
<photo></photo> <photo></photo>