From 0f18d7940a19f3140036d6473bbe0299b6f1fa9c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Philip Sargent <philip.sargent@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 03:28:58 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Corrected valid QM grade list

---
 handbook/survey/qmentry.html | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/handbook/survey/qmentry.html b/handbook/survey/qmentry.html
index 785ebd921..c4ea1075f 100644
--- a/handbook/survey/qmentry.html
+++ b/handbook/survey/qmentry.html
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ description data, replacing the template text with your own as you would with th
 Here is an example from the last bit of bipedalpassage.svx in 264. Note that each QM description is all on one line.
 <pre><code>;-----------
 ;Question Mark List  ;(leave commented-out)
-<em>;Serial number   grade(A/B/C/X)  nearest-station  resolution-station  description</em>
+<em>;Serial number   grade(A/B/C/D/V/X)  nearest-station  resolution-station  description</em>
 ;QM1  A	bipedalpassage.1	-	Very good. 50m+ (?) deep pit below start of 13 bolt bipedal traverse - rather slanted, large ongoing rift glimpsed below. very good.
 ;QM2  A	bipedalpassage.3	-	Very good. 50m+ (?) deep pit below end of 13 bolt bipedal traverse. best approched via station 4 (?) and looks ok to rig. May connect to first deep pit.
 ;QM3  C	bipedalpassage.1	-	Poor c lead, across thin rock bridge over abyss (!) leads to blind aven, but small tube for thin person on left.