diff --git a/years/2022/logbook.html b/years/2022/logbook.html
index 3f613ca84..a5e98459e 100644
--- a/years/2022/logbook.html
+++ b/years/2022/logbook.html
@@ -651,25 +651,36 @@ out, abandoned the Jape to worship the candles, left him the drum, which he proc
Wookey, Philip Balister, Arndt Karger
Rentner-Express - ARGE cave near Windloch
-
Went on a trip with ARGE (Arndt Karger) to see their new cave, Reutner-Express, which has the pleasing characteristics of a) being a 20min walk from the car-park & b) only being about 60m deep.
-
-
This sounded short enough that Philip decided he'd come caving (and had his gear at base - I'd carried mine down specifically after a whole one trip at top camp).
+
Went on a trip with ARGE ( Arndt Karger) to see their new cave, Reutner-Express, which has the pleasing characteristics of a) being
+a 20min walk from the car-park & b) only being about 60m deep.
+
[Why is Arndt's name not being recognised by parsers/people.py ? ]
+
This sounded short enough that Philip decided he'd come caving (and had his gear at base - I'd carried mine down specifically after
+a whole one trip at top camp).
Arndt had a lead from the day before, off 'Schwarze Biest' chamber that needed surveying.
-
To get to the cave take the usual path to part where the split between loser alm/plateau and eizhohle/(illegible) is & turn right (!) off the path up a few meters into a gully in front of an obvious wall a few m high on the left. Except this morning it wasn't obvious at all as it was thoroughtly misty & we could only see about 20m.
+
To get to the cave take the usual path to part where the split between loser alm/plateau and eizhohle/(illegible) is & turn
+right (!) off the path up a few meters into a gully in front of an obvious wall a few m high on the left. Except this morning it wasn't obvious
+at all as it was thoroughtly misty & we could only see about 20m.
We found the rope up the cliff that the (illegible) had installed & then the (illegible).
Cave starts with short tight pitch then a couple of bigger ones leading to a tricky up-pitch.
-
The lead we had to survey turned out to be quite small. AC6 into a twisty passage to the right & an even smaller one to the left. Philip huffed & pulled round a couple of corners & tight bits before deciding that pressing the '(illegible)' was not wise, and retreated back to the chamber. Wook & Aradt continued to the pitch it pops out into, then went back & surveyed the left passage. This rapidly degraded to comedy person-sized surveying but with a flat floor it wasn't quite miserable enough to give up so we surveyed for about an hour (& 50m).
+
The lead we had to survey turned out to be quite small. AC6 into a twisty passage to the right & an even smaller one to the
+left. Philip huffed & pulled round a couple of corners & tight bits before deciding that pressing the '(illegible)' was not wise, and
+retreated back to the chamber. Wook & Aradt continued to the pitch it pops out into, then went back & surveyed the left passage. This
+rapidly degraded to comedy person-sized surveying but with a flat floor it wasn't quite miserable enough to give up so we surveyed for about an
+hour (& 50m).
I went another 10m but it got awkward in the same vein.
-
Back in the chamber, Philip had finally cooled down to a reasonable temp (his furry was too warm). We set off to traverse the system & do the the through-trip to the Windloch (031*) entrance. This was very pleasant with a few short pitches & an entertaining mud sump, which was apparently full of water 2 years ago, but now is just a friction-free U-bend.
+
Back in the chamber, Philip had finally cooled down to a reasonable temp (his furry was too warm). We set off to traverse the
+system & do the the through-trip to the Windloch (031*) entrance. This was very pleasant with a few short pitches & an entertaining mud
+sump, which was apparently full of water 2 years ago, but now is just a friction-free U-bend.
Met the other ARGE group on the way out. Still foggy but we managed to get back to our gear & return after very civilized trip.
[Editor note 1 - 031 is named as Elchole in cave list. 032 is Windloch. Should this be corrected? (Gwen Tawy)
-
Editor note 2 - This Windloch is apparently Windloch am Stogerweg, not the other one - and our cave descriptin is very out of date. Elchhöhle was visited by CUCC in 1978. (Philip Sargent)]
+
Editor note 2 - This Windloch is apparently Windloch am Stogerweg, not the other one - and our cave
+description is very out of date. Elchhöhle was visited by CUCC in 1978. (Philip Sargent)]
T/U: 6.0 hours