expoweb/handbook/survey/gps.htm

63 lines
3.3 KiB
HTML
Raw Normal View History

<html>
2001-08-15 19:29:27 +01:00
<head>
<title>CUCC Expo Surveying Handbook: GPS</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="../../css/main2.css" />
2001-08-15 19:29:27 +01:00
</head>
<body>
<h2 id="tophead">CUCC Expo Surveying Handbook</h2>
<h1>Locating entrances by GPS</h1>
2001-08-15 19:29:27 +01:00
<h3>Which point to fix</h3>
2001-08-15 19:29:27 +01:00
<p>The entrance to a cave significant enough to get a number and a survey
will eventually be marked by a numbered tag attached to a spit. This
will then become the primary survey station - ie. the point where an
underground survey will start, and the point to which a surface survey
should go. It's worth thinking about where you would put such a tag right
from the start. Unlike the first rigging bolt (often used as the first
point of a survey in the past) it should be sited with a particular
view to its visibility and accessibility without having to put on SRT
kit. If such a point has a clear view of the majority of the sky, then
this is the point to use for a GPS fix too.</p>
2001-08-15 19:29:27 +01:00
<p>If however, you are dealing with a cave at the foot of a cliff, or
otherwise with a restricted view of the sky, then choose instead a good
2018-08-11 10:42:43 +01:00
landmark with a wide, clear view of the sky, and within one (or maybe two) survey shots
2001-08-15 19:29:27 +01:00
of the entrance. If you have found a group of caves close together, it
might be better to GPS a central point rather than get quick (but less
accurate) fixes on each entrance.</p>
2023-10-16 23:48:28 +01:00
<p>Yes, you will have to manually do a surface survey leg using your survey instruments between the GPS point and the cave entrance tag station, and record that in your cave survex file.
2001-08-15 19:29:27 +01:00
2018-08-11 10:42:43 +01:00
<p>We now (2018) have differential GPS which is much more accurate than
in the past (e.g. Wookey's 1996 article) but altitudes are often very inaccurate
2023-10-17 22:17:49 +01:00
and GPS devices don't generally tell you how inaccurate the altitude is.
2018-08-11 10:42:43 +01:00
<h3>Taking the fix</h3>
2001-08-15 19:29:27 +01:00
<p>Once you have chosen your point, mark it in some way (could be a spit hole
or a cairn, for example - we aren't supposed to use paint any more) and place
2023-10-17 22:17:49 +01:00
the GPS on the point. Don't build a cairn, they don't last for decades and we have survey stations that old. Give the GPS device a
2001-08-15 19:29:27 +01:00
couple of minutes to get a fairly good fix (the first figure reported may be
quite a way out, but after a couple of minutes things should settle). Then mark
the point as a waypoint. If you're feeling really keen, you can set it up for
<i>averaging</i>, which gives a more accurate fix &ndash; some GPS receivers
support this automatically, and with others you can just leave it recording a
track log, then record another waypoint at the same place just before you leave
so it's clear to someone examining the track log when you actually left.
2023-10-17 22:17:49 +01:00
Averaging the readings like this is vital if you want an even vaguely accurate altitude reading.</p>
2001-08-15 19:29:27 +01:00
<p>While the GPS is recording your location, you can do something useful
(like rigging the cave, doing a surface survey from the GPS point to the
marker spit, looking for other caves, or even having lunch!) Remember to stop
the waypoint averaging before moving the unit or changing the display page.
<b>Take a photo of your GPS point showing at least one of your cave entrances
too.</b></p>
2018-08-11 10:42:43 +01:00
<p>We all use the same coordinate system WGS84 these days, so <a href="coord2.html">the extensive discussion
on coordinate systems</a> has been moved to a different page. If you are really interested you can read
<a href="coord.htm">Olaf's article</a>too.
2001-08-15 19:29:27 +01:00
2023-10-16 23:48:28 +01:00
<hr /></body>
2001-08-15 19:29:27 +01:00
</html>