2004-04-23 13:40:47 +01:00
|
|
|
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
|
|
|
|
|
<html>
|
2002-05-26 13:58:07 +01:00
|
|
|
<head>
|
2004-04-23 13:40:47 +01:00
|
|
|
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
|
|
|
|
|
<title>CUCC Austria Expeditions: QM list conventions</title>
|
2004-04-21 10:35:34 +01:00
|
|
|
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="css/main2.css" />
|
2002-05-26 13:58:07 +01:00
|
|
|
</head>
|
|
|
|
|
<body>
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004-04-23 13:40:47 +01:00
|
|
|
<h1>Question Mark list conventions</h1>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>The format for question mark lists is QM identifier, Quality Grade, Area
|
|
|
|
|
indicator, decription of QM. The QM numbers themselves are in the format
|
|
|
|
|
Discoverer identifier, Year of discovery, Cave identifier, serial number. If
|
|
|
|
|
you look at the html, you will find that the nearest survey station (without
|
|
|
|
|
its "<cavenumber>." prefix) is included in an html comment for almost all
|
|
|
|
|
leads.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>In general, an unpushed QM will have a link from its QM number in the
|
|
|
|
|
description to the list, and a link from the list to the relevant point in the
|
|
|
|
|
description. If there is no link, it means that I can't yet work out where the
|
|
|
|
|
QM is in the description, or the description doesn't yet exist :-).</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002-05-26 13:58:07 +01:00
|
|
|
<h2>Discoverer identifiers</h2>
|
2004-04-23 13:40:47 +01:00
|
|
|
<dl>
|
|
|
|
|
<dt>A</dt>
|
|
|
|
|
<dd>ARGE</dd>
|
|
|
|
|
<dt>B</dt>
|
2007-07-20 18:28:54 +01:00
|
|
|
<dd>Groupe Spéléo de Clerval - Baume les Dames </dd>
|
2004-04-23 13:40:47 +01:00
|
|
|
<dt>C</dt>
|
|
|
|
|
<dd>Cambridge University Caving Club</dd>
|
|
|
|
|
</dl>
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002-05-26 13:58:07 +01:00
|
|
|
<h2>Quality grades</h2>
|
2004-04-23 13:40:47 +01:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<dl>
|
|
|
|
|
<dt>A</dt>
|
|
|
|
|
<dd>A fine QM - git down there and look. </dd>
|
|
|
|
|
<dt>B</dt>
|
|
|
|
|
<dd>Not so promising, or requiring some effort (eg. a climb) </dd>
|
|
|
|
|
<dt>C</dt>
|
|
|
|
|
<dd>Pretty cruddy, or good but very hard to get to.</dd>
|
|
|
|
|
<dt>V</dt>
|
|
|
|
|
<dd>An aven which might be climbable, but not adequately assessed</dd>
|
|
|
|
|
<dt>X</dt>
|
|
|
|
|
<dd>A high, wet or unsafe-looking aven unlikely to be climbed</dd>
|
|
|
|
|
<dt>?</dt>
|
|
|
|
|
<dd>No-one writing this list actually knows!</dd>
|
|
|
|
|
</dl>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Note that the quality grades are assigned by the explorers at the time, and
|
2002-05-26 13:58:07 +01:00
|
|
|
that subsequent discoveries may mean that the grade is optimistic, since the
|
|
|
|
|
lead may now drop into passage which wasn't then explored. Also, different
|
2004-04-23 13:40:47 +01:00
|
|
|
explorers have different ideas, or different waist sizes - one man's "A-lead"
|
|
|
|
|
may be another's "C-lead" :-(</p>
|
|
|
|
|
<hr />
|
2002-05-26 13:58:07 +01:00
|
|
|
|
2004-04-23 13:40:47 +01:00
|
|
|
<ul id="links">
|
|
|
|
|
<li>Back to <a href="../index.htm">CUCC Home page</a></li>
|
|
|
|
|
<li>Back to <a href="index.htm">Expedition Intro page</a></li>
|
|
|
|
|
<li><b>Main Indices:</b>
|
|
|
|
|
<ul>
|
|
|
|
|
<li><a href="infodx.htm"><b>Index</b> to Expo</a> information pages</li>
|
|
|
|
|
<li><a href="areas.htm">Description of CUCC's area</a> and split to subareas</li>
|
|
|
|
|
<li>Full <a href="indxal.htm">Index to cave descriptions</a> in area 1623</li>
|
|
|
|
|
<li>List of (links to) <a href="pubs.htm">published reports and logbooks</a></li>
|
|
|
|
|
</ul></li>
|
|
|
|
|
<li><b>Pictures:</b>
|
|
|
|
|
<ul>
|
|
|
|
|
<li><a href="gall0.htm">Text only Index</a></li>
|
|
|
|
|
<li><a href="gallery/0.htm">Index pages (with thumbnails)</a></li>
|
|
|
|
|
</ul></li>
|
|
|
|
|
<li>Table of <a href="folk/index.htm"><b>members</b> of CUCC expeditions</a> 1976-present</li>
|
2002-05-26 13:58:07 +01:00
|
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
|
</body>
|
|
|
|
|
</html>
|
