expoweb/entrance_data/1623-B5.html

49 lines
2.0 KiB
HTML
Raw Normal View History

2020-02-21 16:01:18 +00:00
<!DOCTYPE html>
<!-- Only put one entrance in this file -->
<!-- If you edit this file, make sure you update the websites database -->
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"/>
</head>
<body>
<entrance>
<non_public>False</non_public>
<slug>1623-B5</slug>
<name></name>
<entrance_description></entrance_description>
<explorers></explorers>
<map_description></map_description>
2021-04-10 19:05:24 +01:00
<location_description>"Right on the col - the scar to the west has large holes immediately below it." This seems to exactly describe <a href="../1623/36/36.html">Schachtgruppe 36</a> as seen from <a href="1623-b4.html">B4</a>. B5 was not relocated in searches in 1990 and 1995. The Austrians thought B5 was the same as Kat. 35, but Waddington notes that the descriptions don't match well and Auer's map shows 35 as SW from 36. However, <a href="../1623/75.htm">Wisenth&ouml;hle (1623/75)</a> is very close to B4, and if snow levels were high could be a 10m descent to a snow choke (Olly's theory).</location_description>
2020-02-21 16:01:18 +00:00
<approach></approach>
<underground_description></underground_description>
<photo></photo>
<!-- marking options: P = Paint,
P? = Paint (?),
T = Tag,
T? = Tag (?),
R = Retagged,
S = Spit,
S? = Spit (?),
U = Unmarked,
? = Unknown" -->
<marking></marking>
<marking_comment></marking_comment>
<!-- findability options: ? = To be confirmed ...,
S = Surveyed,
L = Lost,
R = Refindable" -->
<findability>L</findability>
<findability_description>Probably hopeless</findability_description>
<alt></alt>
<northing></northing>
<easting></easting>
<tag_station></tag_station>
<exact_station></exact_station>
<other_station></other_station>
<other_description></other_description>
<bearings></bearings>
<url></url>
</entrance>
</body>
</html>