expoweb/cave_data/1623-156.html

<!DOCTYPE html>
<!-- Only put one cave in this file -->
<!-- If you edit this file, make sure you update the websites database -->
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"/>
</head>
<body>
<cave>
<non_public>False</non_public>
<caveslug>1623-156</caveslug>
<official_name>Schwa Schacht 156</official_name>
<area>1623</area>
<area>2c</area>
<kataster_code>1/S +</kataster_code>
<kataster_number>156</kataster_number> 
<unofficial_number></unofficial_number>

<entrance>
  <entranceslug>1623-156</entranceslug>
  <letter></letter>
</entrance>

<explorers>CUCC 1987</explorers>
<underground_description>An open rift with a rock bridge. Pitch of 25m drops onto snow bank, and route to southeast of this drops a further 15m to a complete choke with snow.</underground_description>
<equipment></equipment>
<references></references>
<survey></p><div class="centre"><img alt="Map+survey" width="620" height="336" src="/1623/others/156.png" /></div><p>Grade 1 plan/elev of 156 and T.B.H. from <a href="/years/1987/log.htm">1987 Log Book</a></survey>
<kataster_status></kataster_status>
<underground_centre_line></underground_centre_line>
<notes>The <a href="/years/1987/log.htm">log book</a> refers to exploration in the vicinity of 0/1 including 156 and a nearby cave (unnumbered in 1987) <a href="../199.htm">Tumbling Boulder Hole</a>. There is, however, another piece of paper which says it is very near (and NE of) point 0/2. This appears to arise from the diagram which accompanies the log book entry, which shows 0/2 with no north arrow, and uphill up the page. If the point was really 0/1 on this diagram, then the descriptions would match, with north at 7 O'Clock on the diagram. The logbook suggests that the discoverers had visited 0/2 (and found very little nearby) and then 0/1 later, finding 156. GPS location and later a surface survey (1998) confirms that 0/1 is the correct laser point.</notes>
<length></length>
<depth></depth>
<extent></extent>
<survex_file></survex_file>
<description_file></description_file>
<url>1623/156/156.html</url>
</cave>
</body>
</html>
fiximng moistake. 2020-02-21 16:01:18 +00:00			`<!DOCTYPE html>`
			`<!-- Only put one cave in this file -->`
			`<!-- If you edit this file, make sure you update the websites database -->`
			`<html lang="en">`
			`<head>`
			`<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"/>`
			`</head>`
			`<body>`
			`<cave>`
			`<non_public>False</non_public>`
			`<caveslug>1623-156</caveslug>`
			`<official_name>Schwa Schacht 156</official_name>`
			`<area>1623</area>`
			`<area>2c</area>`
			`<kataster_code>1/S +</kataster_code>`
			`<kataster_number>156</kataster_number>`
			`<unofficial_number></unofficial_number>`

			`<entrance>`
			`<entranceslug>1623-156</entranceslug>`
			`<letter></letter>`
			`</entrance>`

			`<explorers>CUCC 1987</explorers>`
			`<underground_description>An open rift with a rock bridge. Pitch of 25m drops onto snow bank, and route to southeast of this drops a further 15m to a complete choke with snow.</underground_description>`
			`<equipment></equipment>`
			`<references></references>`
refernces to logbooks fixed in descriptions 2024-07-10 16:51:31 +01:00			`<survey></p><div class="centre"><img alt="Map+survey" width="620" height="336" src="/1623/others/156.png" /></div><p>Grade 1 plan/elev of 156 and T.B.H. from <a href="/years/1987/log.htm">1987 Log Book</a></survey>`
fiximng moistake. 2020-02-21 16:01:18 +00:00			`<kataster_status></kataster_status>`
			`<underground_centre_line></underground_centre_line>`
refernces to logbooks fixed in descriptions 2024-07-10 16:51:31 +01:00			<notes>The <a href="/years/1987/log.htm">log book</a> refers to exploration in the vicinity of 0/1 including 156 and a nearby cave (unnumbered in 1987) <a href="../199.htm">Tumbling Boulder Hole</a>. There is, however, another piece of paper which says it is very near (and NE of) point 0/2. This appears to arise from the diagram which accompanies the log book entry, which shows 0/2 with no north arrow, and uphill up the page. If the point was really 0/1 on this diagram, then the descriptions would match, with north at 7 O'Clock on the diagram. The logbook suggests that the discoverers had visited 0/2 (and found very little nearby) and then 0/1 later, finding 156. GPS location and later a surface survey (1998) confirms that 0/1 is the correct laser point.</notes>
fiximng moistake. 2020-02-21 16:01:18 +00:00			`<length></length>`
			`<depth></depth>`
			`<extent></extent>`
			`<survex_file></survex_file>`
Invalid description_file filename set to blank 2021-04-14 18:59:48 +01:00			`<description_file></description_file>`
fiximng moistake. 2020-02-21 16:01:18 +00:00			`<url>1623/156/156.html</url>`
			`</cave>`
			`</body>`
			`</html>`